Author:
Afrouzian Marjan,Kozakowski Nicolas,Liapis Helen,Broecker Verena,Truong Luon,Avila-Casado Carmen,Regele Heinz,Seshan Surya,Ambruzs Josephine M.,Farris Alton Brad,Buob David,Chander Praveen N.,Cheraghvandi Lukman,Clahsen-van Groningen Marian C.,de Almeida Araujo Stanley,Ertoy Baydar Dilek,Formby Mark,Galesic Ljubanovic Danica,Herrera Hernandez Loren,Honsova Eva,Mohamed Nasreen,Ozluk Yasemin,Rabant Marion,Royal Virginie,Stevenson Heather L.,Toniolo Maria Fernanda,Taheri Diana
Abstract
The Banff community summoned the TMA Banff Working Group to develop minimum diagnostic criteria (MDC) and recommendations for renal transplant TMA (Tx-TMA) diagnosis, which currently lacks standardized criteria. Using the Delphi method for consensus generation, 23 nephropathologists (panelists) with >3 years of diagnostic experience with Tx-TMA were asked to list light, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopic, clinical and laboratory criteria and differential diagnoses for Tx-TMA. Delphi was modified to include 2 validations rounds with histological evaluation of whole slide images of 37 transplant biopsies (28 TMA and 9 non-TMA). Starting with 338 criteria in R1, MDC were narrowed down to 24 in R8 generating 18 pathological, 2 clinical, 4 laboratory criteria, and 8 differential diagnoses. The panelists reached a good level of agreement (70%) on 76% of the validated cases. For the first time in Banff classification, Delphi was used to reach consensus on MDC for Tx-TMA. Phase I of the study (pathology phase) will be used as a model for Phase II (nephrology phase) for consensus regarding clinical and laboratory criteria. Eventually in Phase III (consensus of the consensus groups) and the final MDC for Tx-TMA will be reported to the transplantation community.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献