Author:
Nordmoen Jørgen,Veenstra Frank,Ellefsen Kai Olav,Glette Kyrre
Abstract
In modular robotics modules can be reconfigured to change the morphology of the robot, making it able to adapt to specific tasks. However, optimizing both the body and control of such robots is a difficult challenge due to the intricate relationship between fine-tuning control and morphological changes that can invalidate such optimizations. These challenges can trap many optimization algorithms in local optima, halting progress towards better solutions. To solve this challenge we compare three different Evolutionary Algorithms on their capacity to optimize high performing and diverse morphologies and controllers in modular robotics. We compare two objective-based search algorithms, with and without a diversity promoting objective, with a Quality Diversity algorithm—MAP-Elites. The results show that MAP-Elites is capable of evolving the highest performing solutions in addition to generating the largest morphological diversity. Further, MAP-Elites is superior at regaining performance when transferring the population to new and more difficult environments. By analyzing genealogical ancestry we show that MAP-Elites produces more diverse and higher performing stepping stones than the two other objective-based search algorithms. The experiments transitioning the populations to new environments show the utility of morphological diversity, while the analysis of stepping stones show a strong correlation between diversity of ancestry and maximum performance on the locomotion task. Together, these results demonstrate the suitability of MAP-elites for the challenging task of morphology-control search for modular robots, and shed light on the algorithm’s capability of generating stepping stones for reaching high-performing solutions.
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Computer Science Applications
Reference53 articles.
1. OpenAI gym
BrockmanG.
CheungV.
PetterssonL.
SchneiderJ.
SchulmanJ.
TangJ.
2016
2. Morphological evolution of physical robots through model-free phenotype development;Brodbeck;PLoS One,2015
3. Scalable co-optimization of morphology and control in embodied machines;Cheney;J. R. Soc. Interface,2018
4. On the difficulty of co-optimizing morphology and control in evolved virtual creatures;Cheney,2016
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献