Author:
Hareli Shlomo,Elkabetz Shimon,Hanoch Yaniv,Hess Ursula
Abstract
Two studies showed that emotion expressions serve as cues to the expresser’s willingness to take risks in general, as well as in five risk domains (ethical, financial, health and safety, recreational, and social). Emotion expressions did not have a uniform effect on risk estimates across risk domains. Rather, these effects fit behavioral intentions associated with each emotion. Thus, anger expressions were related to ethical and social risks. Sadness reduced perceived willingness to take financial (Study 1 only), recreational, and social risks. Happiness reduced perceived willingness to take ethical and health/safety risks relative to neutrality. Disgust expressions increased the perceived likelihood of taking a social risk. Finally, neutrality increased the perceived willingness to engage in risky behavior in general. Overall, these results suggest that observers use their naïve understanding of the meaning of emotions to infer how likely an expresser is to engage in risky behavior.
Reference41 articles.
1. A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations;Blais;Judgm. Decis. Mak.,2006
2. Neutral faces in context: their emotional meaning and their function;Carrera-Levillain;J. Nonverbal Behav.,1994
3. Are you risk averse over other people’s money?;Chakravarty;South. Econ. J.,2011
4. Reading people’s minds from emotion expressions in interdependent decision making;de Melo;J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献