Author:
Tuomaala Anna-Kaisa,Hero Matti,Tuomisto Martti T.,Lähteenmäki Maria,Miettinen Päivi J.,Laine Tiina,Wehkalampi Karoliina,Kiiveri Sanne,Ahonen Pekka,Ojaniemi Marja,Kaunisto Kari,Tossavainen Päivi,Lapatto Risto,Sarkola Taisto,Pulkkinen Mari-Anne
Abstract
A multicenter randomized controlled pilot trial investigated whether motivational interviewing (MI) by diabetes physicians improves glycemic control and variability in the context of follow-up for adolescent patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes. Patients (n = 47) aged 12 to 15.9 years who showed poor glycemic control (HbA1c >75 mmol/mol/9.0%) were randomized to standard education (SE) only or MI+SE, with study physicians randomized to employ MI+SE (N = 24 patients) or SE only (N = 23). For one year of follow-up, the main outcome measurements were obtained at three-month visits (HbA1c) or six-monthly: time in range (TIR) and glycemic variability (CV). Mean adjusted 12-month change in HbA1c was similar between the MI+SE and SE-only group (-3.6 vs. -1.0 mmol/mol), and no inter-group differences were visible in the mean adjusted 12-month change in TIR (-0.8 vs. 2.6%; P = 0.53) or CV (-0.5 vs. -6.2; P = 0.26). However, the order of entering the study correlated significantly with the 12-month change in HbA1c in the MI+SE group (r = -0.5; P = 0.006) and not in the SE-only group (r = 0.2; P = 0.4). No link was evident between MI and changes in quality of life. The authors conclude that MI’s short-term use by diabetes physicians managing adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes was not superior to SE alone; however, improved skills in applying the MI method at the outpatient clinic may produce greater benefits in glycemic control.
Funder
Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö
Lastentautien Tutkimussäätiö
Diabetestutkimussäätiö
Suomen Lääketieteen Säätiö
Subject
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism