Diagnostic value of RDW for the prediction of mortality in adult sepsis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Wu Hongsheng,Liao Biling,Cao Tiansheng,Ji Tengfei,Huang Jianbin,Ma Keqiang

Abstract

BackgroundRed blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a common biomarker of bacterial infections, and it can be easily obtained from a routine blood test. We investigate the diagnostic value of RDW for the prediction of mortality in adult sepsis patients through a review and meta-analysis. We registered this review in PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42022357712), and the details of the registration are included in Appendix 1.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Springer, and Embase between Jan. 1, 2000, and May 30, 2022, for primary studies about this research. We collected articles that investigated RDW for varying degrees of sepsis patients—those who suffered from sepsis, severe sepsis, or sepsis shock. Studies of healthy people and sepsis of children and neonates were excluded from our research. The definition of study characteristics and data extraction were finished by two independent researchers and discrepancies resolved by consensus. The combined sensitivities and specificities were calculated by meta-analysis using STATA14.0. The sensitivity of the included studies was analyzed by excluding studies that had potential heterogeneity. A summary operating characteristic curve was made to evaluate the diagnostic value for the prediction of mortality in adult sepsis patients. The Fagan test was used to explore likelihood ratios and posttest probabilities. Finally, we investigated the source of heterogeneity using meta-regression.ResultsTwenty-four studies, including 40,763 cases altogether, were included in this analysis. Bivariate analysis indicated a combined sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI 0.73–0.86) and specificity of 0.65 (95% CI 0.54–0.75). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81 (95% CI 0.77–0.84). Substantial heterogeneity resided in the studies (I2 =96.68, 95% CI 95.95–97.4). Meta-regression showed that the reference description, prospective design, and blinded interpretation of the included studies could be responsible for the heterogeneity.ConclusionsRWD is an available and valuable biomarker for prediction of mortality in adult sepsis patients.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022357712.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Immunology,Immunology and Allergy

Reference49 articles.

1. Sepsis and septic shock: New definitions, new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches;Esposito;J Global antimicrob. resist.,2017

2. Sepsis update: Definition and epidemiology;Bracht;Anasthesiol. Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie AINS.,2019

3. Sepsis: evolving concepts and challenges;Salomão;Braz J Med Biol Res = Rev Bras pesquisas medicas e biologicas.,2019

4. Sepsis and septic shock: Current approaches to management;Thompson;Internal Med J,2019

5. Sepsis, a 2020 review for the internist;Purcarea;Romanian J Internal Med = Rev roumaine med interne.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3