Author:
Bruneval Fabien,Dattani Nike,van Setten Michiel J.
Abstract
We use the GW100 benchmark set to systematically judge the quality of several perturbation theories against high-level quantum chemistry methods. First of all, we revisit the reference CCSD(T) ionization potentials for this popular benchmark set and establish a revised set of CCSD(T) results. Then, for all of these 100 molecules, we calculate the HOMO energy within second and third-order perturbation theory (PT2 and PT3), and, GW as post-Hartree-Fock methods. We found GW to be the most accurate of these three approximations for the ionization potential, by far. Going beyond GW by adding more diagrams is a tedious and dangerous activity: We tried to complement GW with second-order exchange (SOX), with second-order screened exchange (SOSEX), with interacting electron-hole pairs (WTDHF), and with a GW density-matrix (γGW). Only the γGW result has a positive impact. Finally using an improved hybrid functional for the non-interacting Green’s function, considering it as a cheap way to approximate self-consistency, the accuracy of the simplest GW approximation improves even more. We conclude that GW is a miracle: Its subtle balance makes GW both accurate and fast.
Reference89 articles.
1. Quasiparticle Calculations in Solids;Aulbur;Solid State. Phys.,1999
2. BrunevalF.
2021
3. Conservation Laws and Correlation Functions;Baym;Phys. Rev.,1961
4. A New Mixing of Hartree-Fock and Local Density‐functional Theories;Becke;J. Chem. Phys.,1993
5. Full-frequency GW without Frequency;Bintrim;J. Chem. Phys.,2021
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献