Author:
Güler Oğuz,Hatırnaz Şafak,Sparic Radmila,Basbug Alper,Erol Onur,Kalkan Üzeyir,Ulubaşoğlu Hasan,Trojano Giuseppe,Ürkmez Sebati Sinan,Tinelli Andrea
Abstract
ObjectivesThe safety of cesarean myomectomy has been proven by previous studies. Our study aimed to reveal the long-term perinatal, obstetric, and surgical outcomes of cesarean myomectomy (CM) by comparing different CM techniques.Material and methodsThis retrospective multicentric case–control study involved 7 hospitals and included 226 singleton pregnancies that underwent repeated cesarean section (CS) between 2015 and 2020. Among these pregnancies, 113 of 226 cases had CM (Group A), and 113 had only CS (Group B). Of the 113 cases in which CM was performed, 58 underwent endometrial myomectomy (EM) (Subgroup A1) and 55 underwent serosal myomectomy (SM) (Subgroup A2). The groups were compared in terms of obstetric, perinatal, and surgical outcomes, and fibroid recurrence, myomectomy scar healing rate, and adhesion formation were noted.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the groups in terms of maternal age, body mass index, gravidity, parity, and fibroid diameter in previous CS (p > 0.05). In the perinatal and obstetric evaluation of the groups, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of neonatal weight, Apgar score, fetal growth restriction, preterm premature rupture of membranes, preterm delivery, hypertension in pregnancy, and diabetes mellitus (p > 0.05). The fibroid recurrence rate was 28.3%, and the myomectomy scar good healing rate was 99.1%. There was no difference between the groups in terms of CS duration, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, perioperative blood transfusion rates, febrile morbidity, and prolonged hospitalization (p > 0.05). In terms of adhesion formation, although the adhesion rate of the SM group was higher than that of the EM group, no statistically significant difference was detected between the groups.ConclusionThis study showed that in pregnancies following CM, obstetrical, perinatal, and surgical outcomes were unaffected. Obstetricians can safely use CM, either the trans-endometrial or serosal technique, as it is a safe and effective method with long-term results.
Reference46 articles.
1. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a review;Sparic;Int J Fertil Steril,2016
2. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany) and Vienna Institute of Demography (Austria)
3. Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery;Klatsky;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2008
4. Contemporary management of fibroids in pregnancy;Lee;Rev Obstet Gynecol,2010
5. Cesarean myomectomy trends and controversies: an appraisal;Sparic;J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2017