Author:
Qiu Kun-yin,Xu Hong-gui,Luo Xue-qun,Mai Hui-rong,Liao Ning,Yang Li-hua,Zheng Min-cui,Wan Wu-qing,Wu Xue-dong,Liu Ri-yang,Chen Qi-wen,Chen Hui-qin,Sun Xiao-fei,Jiang Hua,Long Xing-jiang,Chen Guo-hua,Li Xin-yu,Li Chang-gang,Huang Li-bin,Ling Ya-yun,Lin Dan-na,Wen Chuan,Kuang Wen-yong,Feng Xiao-qin,Ye Zhong-lv,Wu Bei-yan,He Xiang-lin,Li Qiao-ru,Wang Li-na,Kong Xian-ling,Xu Lu-hong,Li Chi-kong,Fang Jian-pei
Abstract
PurposeTo analyzed the outcome of ETV6/RUNX1-positive pediatric acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) with the aim of identifying prognostic value.MethodA total of 2,530 pediatric patients who were diagnosed with B-ALL were classified into two groups based on the ETV6/RUNX1 status by using a retrospective cohort study method from February 28, 2008, to June 30, 2020, at 22 participating ALL centers.ResultsIn total, 461 (18.2%) cases were ETV6/RUNX1-positive. The proportion of patients with risk factors (age <1 year or ≥10 years, WB≥50×109/L) in ETV6/RUNX1-positive group was significantly lower than that in negative group (P<0.001), while the proportion of patients with good early response (good response to prednisone, D15 MRD < 0.1%, and D33 MRD < 0.01%) in ETV6/RUNX1-positive group was higher than that in the negative group (P<0.001, 0.788 and 0.004, respectively). Multivariate analysis of 2,530 patients found that age <1 or ≥10 years, SCCLG-ALL-2016 protocol, and MLL were independent predictor of outcome but not ETV6/RUNX1. The EFS and OS of the ETV6/RUNX1-positive group were significantly higher than those of the negative group (3-year EFS: 90.11 ± 4.21% vs 82 ± 2.36%, P<0.0001, 3-year OS: 91.99 ± 3.92% vs 88.79 ± 1.87%, P=0.017). Subgroup analysis showed that chemotherapy protocol, age, prednisone response, and D15 MRD were important factors affecting the prognosis of ETV6/RUNX1-positive children.ConclusionsETV6/RUNX1-positive pediatric ALL showed an excellent outcome but lack of independent prognostic significance in South China. However, for older patients who have the ETV6/RUNX1 fusion and slow response to therapy, to opt for more intensive treatment.