Clinical Effectiveness of Ion-Releasing Restorations versus Composite Restorations in Dental Restorations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Clinical Effectiveness of Ion-Releasing Restorations versus Composite Restorations in Dental Restorations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Published:2024-05-24 Issue:6 Volume:12 Page:158
ISSN:2304-6767
Container-title:Dentistry Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:Dentistry Journal

Author:

Arbildo-Vega Heber Isac¹²^ORCID,Cruzado-Oliva Fredy Hugo³^ORCID,Coronel-Zubiate Franz Tito⁴^ORCID,Luján-Valencia Sara Antonieta⁵⁶,Meza-Málaga Joan Manuel⁶⁷^ORCID,Aguirre-Ipenza Rubén⁸,Echevarria-Goche Adriana⁹^ORCID,Luján-Urviola Eduardo¹⁰,Castillo-Cornock Tania Belú¹¹¹,Serquen-Olano Katherine¹¹¹^ORCID,Farje-Gallardo Carlos Alberto⁴

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Dentistry, Dentistry School, Universidad San Martín de Porres, Chiclayo 14012, Peru

2. Faculty of Human Medicine, Human Medicine School, Universidad San Martín de Porres, Chiclayo 14012, Peru

3. Faculty of Stomatology, Stomatology School, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo 13001, Peru

4. Faculty of Health Sciences, Stomatology School, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru

5. Postgraduate School, Universidad Católica de Santa María, Arequipa 04013, Peru

6. Faculty of Dentistry, Dentistry School, Universidad Católica de Santa María, Arequipa 04013, Peru

7. Faculty of Medicine, Medicine School, Universidad Católica de Santa María, Arequipa 04013, Peru

8. Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Continental, Lima 15046, Peru

9. Department of Dentistry, Dentistry School, Norbert Wiener University, Lima 15046, Peru

10. Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Andina Néstor Cáceres Velásquez, Juliaca 21104, Peru

11. Faculty of Health Sciences, Stomatology School, Universida Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo 14000, Peru

Abstract

Background: To compare the clinical effectiveness of ion-releasing restorations (IRR) vs. composite resin (CR) in dental restorations. Methods: A systematic search was carried out from articles published until January 2024, in the biomedical databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scielo, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Randomized clinical trials were included, with a follow-up time greater than or equal to 1 year, without time and language limits and which reported the clinical effect of IRR compared to CR in dental restorations. The RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies and the GRADEPro GDT tool was used to assess the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation of the results. Results: The search yielded a total of 1109 articles. After excluding those that did not meet the selection criteria, 29 articles remained for the quantitative synthesis. The analysis found no statistically significant difference when comparing the dental restorations with IRRs or CRs. Conclusion: The literature reviewed suggests that there are no differences between the IRRs and CRs in dental restorations.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Link

https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/12/6/158/pdf

Reference81 articles.

1. Dobrzański, L.A., Dobrzański, L.B., Dobrzańska-Danikiewicz, A.D., and Dobrzańska, J. (2020). The Concept of Sustainable Development of Modern Dentistry. Processes, 8.

2. A Critical Evaluation of Tribological Interaction for Restorative Materials in Dentistry;Yadav;Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater.,2019

3. Longevity of Composite Restorations Is Definitely Not Only about Materials;Demarco;Dent. Mater. Off. Publ. Acad. Dent. Mater.,2023

4. Esthetic Restorations and Smile Designing: A Review;Kaur;Int. J. Health Sci.,2021

5. The Safety and Biocompatibility of Direct Aesthetic Restorative Materials;Hatton;Br. Dent. J.,2022