Welfare Assessment in Pigs Using the Salivary Proteome
Author:
Prims Sara1ORCID, Van Ginneken Chris1ORCID, Van Ostade Xaveer2ORCID, Casteleyn Christophe13
Affiliation:
1. Comparative Perinatal Development, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium 2. Laboratory of Protein Science, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium 3. Department of Morphology, Medical Imaging, Orthopedics, Physiotherapy and Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
Abstract
Identifying the potential presence of stress at the pig farm is fundamental since it affects pig welfare. As a result, a reliable and straightforward tool to monitor stress could record the welfare status of the animals. Although numerous methods to assess the welfare of pigs have been developed in the past, no gold standard has been established yet. Recently, the value of saliva as a tool to identify chronic stress in piglets was explored, as it can be collected fast and non-invasively. Since the protein composition, i.e., the proteome of porcine saliva, responds to stress, the affected proteins could be used as salivary stress biomarkers. The present review first defines stress and its relationship with welfare. Next, the porcine gland-specific salivary proteome is characterized. Finally, six potential salivary biomarkers for stress are proposed, i.e., odorant-binding protein, vomeromodulin-like protein, chitinase, lipocalin-1, long palate lung and nasal epithelium protein, and alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein.
Reference65 articles.
1. Pig’s responses to repeated social regrouping and relocation during the growing-finishing period;Coutellier;Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.,2007 2. Pig acute-phase protein levels after stress induced by changes in the pattern of food administration;Morales;Animal,2007 3. Characterisation of the pig acute phase protein response to road transport;Carpintero;Vet. J.,2007 4. Martínez-Miró, S., Tecles, F., Ramón, M., Escribano, D., Hernández, F., Madrid, J., Orengo, J., Martínez-Subiela, S., Manteca, X., and Cerón, J.J. (2016). Causes, consequences and biomarkers of stress in swine: An update. BMC Vet. Res., 12. 5. Cerón, J.J., Contreras-Aguilar, M.D., Escribano, D., Martínez-Miró, S., López-Martínez, M.J., Ortín-Bustillo, A., Franco-Martínez, L., Rubio, C.P., Muñoz-Prieto, A., and Tvarijonaviciute, A. (2022). Basics for the potential use of saliva to evaluate stress, inflammation, immune system, and redox homeostasis in pigs. BMC Vet. Res., 18.
|
|