Cognitive Distortions as Barriers to Seeking Smoking Cessation Treatment: A Comparative Study

Author:

Arpacıoğlu Selim1ORCID,Erzincan Erkal2,Ergelen Mine3ORCID,Arpacıoğlu Beyza3,Paltun Salih Cihat3,Yalçın Murat3ORCID,Bilici Rabia4

Affiliation:

1. Psychiatry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Altınbaş University, Istanbul 34147, Turkey

2. Psychology Department, Faculty of Economics Administrative and Social Sciences, Gelişim University, Istanbul 34310, Turkey

3. Psychiatry Department, Erenköy Training and Research Hospital for Mental and Neurological Diseases, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul 34736, Turkey

4. Psychology Department, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Istanbul Ticaret University, Istanbul 34445, Turkey

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Despite the availability of effective pharmacotherapy and evidence-based treatments, a substantial proportion of smokers do not seek treatment. This study aims to explore the cognitive distortions associated with not seeking evidence-based smoking cessation treatment and to identify cognitive barriers. Methods: The research conducted in Istanbul between October and December 2017 employs a cross-sectional design and includes two groups: a treatment-seeking group comprising 156 patients diagnosed with tobacco use disorder and a non-treatment seeking group of 78 patients with tobacco use disorder who had never sought professional help for smoking cessation. A comprehensive data collection process was used, including sociodemographic information, cognitive distortion assessment using the cognitive distortions scale, a smoking-related cognitive distortions interview and the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence. Results: While no significant sociodemographic differences were observed between the treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking groups, the study found that higher nicotine dependence was associated with a higher likelihood of seeking treatment. The treatment-seeking group displayed significantly higher levels of “all-or-nothing thinking” cognitive distortions related to smoking and smoking cessation. Conversely, the non-treatment-seeking group exhibited elevated levels of cognitive distortions such as “labeling”, “mental filtering”, “should statements” and “minimizing the positive” regarding receiving smoking cessation treatment. Conclusions: Understanding the cognitive distortions associated with treatment-seeking behavior for tobacco use disorder is crucial for developing targeted public-based interventions, public service announcements for tobacco use prevention and encouraging individuals to seek evidence-based treatment. Addressing these cognitive distortions can also potentially enhance the effectiveness of smoking cessation programs and reduce the global burden of tobacco-related diseases and mortality.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference48 articles.

1. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024, June 16). NHIS—Adult Tobacco Use—Glossary, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/tobacco/tobacco_glossary.htm.

2. WHO (2015). Prevalence of Tobacco Use, World Health Organization.

3. Rodgers, A., Vaughan, P., Prentice, T., Edejer, T.T.T., and Evans, D. (2002). The World Health Report 2002, World Health Organization.

4. Combined pharmacotherapy and behavioural interventions for smoking cessation;Stead;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2016

5. Additional behavioural support as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation;Hong;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3