Cage-Free Pullets Minimally Affected by Stocking Density Stressors
Author:
Abraham Meagan E.1, Robison Cara I.2ORCID, Serpa Priscila B. S.3ORCID, Strandberg Natalia J.3ORCID, Erasmus Marisa A.1, Fraley Gregory S.1ORCID, Erf Gisela F.4ORCID, Karcher Darrin M.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2050, USA 2. Department of Animal Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-2604, USA 3. Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, VA-MD College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA 4. Department of Poultry Science, System Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
Abstract
Management choices during the pullet phase can affect behavior, welfare, and health later in life, but few studies have evaluated the pullet phase, particularly in extensive housing systems. This study was a 2 × 2 factorial randomized complete block design (RCBD) with two strains and two stocking densities. The Lohmann LB-Lite and Lohmann LSL-Lite were housed on the floor at high-stocking density (619–670 cm2/bird) and low-stocking density (1249–1352 cm2/bird), which changed with age from 2 to 16 weeks of age (WOA). Bird-based measures of appearance, blood parameters, organ measurements, and production values were evaluated. Stocking density alone affected (p < 0.05) only relative bursal weight (% of body weight)—3.32% in the low-density versus 3.08% in the high-density group. High-stocking density was correlated with decreased uniformity (high—89.33 ± 0.24%; low—90.41 ± 0.24; p < 0.02) and worse feather coverage in the brown strain. High-stocking density was correlated with greater uniformity (High—90.39 ± 0.24%; Low—88.47 ± 0.24%; p < 0.001) and better feather coverage in the white strain. This study’s feed conversion ratio (FCR) was improved by 0.07 in the low-stocking density for both strains. The remaining parameters were affected by strain and age only. Thus, while stocking density effects vary slightly depending on the strain used, cage-free pullets had limited negative effects at both the high and low-stocking densities tested in this study; there were few to no changes in the numerous bird-based welfare parameters tested.
Funder
United States Poultry and Egg Association
Reference88 articles.
1. Ibarburu, M. (2022, July 07). Flock Trends and Projections. Egg Industry Center. 4 April 2020. Available online: https://www.eggindustrycenter.org/browse/files/3aa25476a2e4455eb0fd25589c76ee87/download. 2. Krause, E.T., and Schrader, L. (2019). Suggestions to Derive Maximum Stocking Densities for Layer Pullets. Animals, 9. 3. Widowski, T.M., Classen, H., Newberry, R.C., Petrik, M., Schwean-Lardner, K., Cottee, S.Y., and Cox, B. (2013). Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Pullets, Layers, and Spent Fowl: Poultry (Layers), Poultry (Layer) Code of Practice Scientific Committee. Review of Scientific Research on Priority Issues. 4. Review: Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens;Janczak;Poult. Sci.,2015 5. Jensen, L. (2019). The Effects of Stocking Density on the Growth, Behaviour, and Welfare of Layer Pullets in Two Cage Systems. [Master’s Thesis, The University of Guelph].
|
|