Subcutaneous versus Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Requiring Dialysis: Extended Long-Term Retrospective Multicenter Follow-Up

Author:

Schiedat Fabian12ORCID,Meuterodt Benjamin3ORCID,Winter Joachim4ORCID,Prull Magnus5,Aweimer Assem2,Gotzmann Michael6,O’Connor Stephen7,Perings Christian3,Lawo Thomas8,El-Battrawy Ibrahim29,Hanefeld Christoph6,Korth Johannes10ORCID,Mügge Andreas26ORCID,Kloppe Axel12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Marienhospital Gelsenkirchen, Academic Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, 45886 Gelsenkirchen, Germany

2. Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum of the Ruhr-University Bochum, 44789 Bochum, Germany

3. Department of Cardiology, Electrophysiology, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Marien-Hospital Luenen, Academic Hospital of the University Muenster, 44534 Lünen, Germany

4. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine University Hospital, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany

5. Department of Cardiology, Augusta Hospital Bochum, Academic Hospital of the University Duisburg Essen, 44791 Bochum, Germany

6. Department of Cardiology, Katholische Kliniken Bochum of the Ruhr University Bochum, 44791 Bochnum, Germany

7. Department of Biomedical Engineering, City, University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK

8. Department of Cardiology, Elisabeth Hospital Recklinghausen, 45661 Recklinghausen, Germany

9. Department of Molecular and Experimental Cardiology, Institut für Forschung und Lehre (IFL), Ruhr-University Bochum, 44791 Bochum, Germany

10. Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany

Abstract

Background: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD). Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis are at a very high risk of infection from cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation as well as mortality. In the present study, we compared the long-term complications and outcomes between subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) and transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) recipients. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we analyzed a total of 43 patients with ESRD requiring dialysis who received either a prophylactic S-ICD (26 patients) or a single right ventricular lead TV-ICD (17 patients) at seven experienced centers in Germany. Follow-up was performed bi-annually, at the end of which the data concerning comorbidities and, if applicable, reason for death were checked and confirmed with patients’ general practitioner, nephrologist and cardiologist. Results: The median follow up duration was 95.6 months (range 42.8–126.3 months). Baseline characteristics were without noteworthy significant differences between groups. During follow-up (FU), there were significantly more device-associated infections (HR 8.72, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18 to 12.85, p < 0.05) and device-associated hospitalizations (HR 10.20, 95% CI 1.22 to 84.61, p < 0.001), as well as a higher cardiovascular mortality (HR 9.17, 95% CI 1.12 to 8.33, p < 0.05), in the TV-ICD group. The number of patients requiring hospitalization for any reason was significantly higher in the TV-ICD group (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.12 to 6.41, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in overall mortality (HR 1.92, 95% CI 0.96 to 6.15, p = 0.274). Conclusions: Our data suggest that, in this extended follow-up in seriously compromised renal patients on dialysis, the S-ICD patients have statistically fewer device infections and hospitalizations as well as lower cardiac mortality compared with the TV-ICD cohort.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3