Abstract
Digital health tools, such as apps, have the potential to promote healthy behaviours, especially self-monitoring, which can facilitate pregnancy management and reduce the risk of associated pregnancy health conditions. While pregnancy apps are popular amongst pregnant women, there is limited information about the overall quality of their content or self-monitoring tools and the number of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) that they include. The aim of this study was thus to assess the quality of pregnancy apps for self-monitoring, and their usage of BCTs. We identified pregnancy apps by web scraping the most popular global apps for self-monitoring in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store available in Australia. The app quality was evaluated using the scorecard approach and the inclusion of BCTs was evaluated using the ABACUS tool. We identified 31 pregnancy apps that met our eligibility criteria. We found that pregnancy apps tended to score the highest in the domains of ‘cost and time’, ‘usability’, and ‘technical’, and lowest on ‘clinical’ and ‘end-user requirements’. Additionally, the majority of apps contained minimal BCTs. Based on our findings, we propose a digital health scorecard visualisation that would break down app quality criteria and present them in a more accessible way to clinicians and pregnant users. We conclude that these findings highlight the shortcomings of available commercial pregnancy apps and the utility of a digital health scorecard visualisation that would empower users to make more informed decisions about which apps are the most appropriate for their needs.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference60 articles.
1. DataReportal (2022, November 10). Digital around the World. Available online: https://datareportal.com/global-digital-overview.
2. A Mobile Prenatal Care App to Reduce In-Person Visits: Prospective Controlled Trial;Marko;JMIR mHealth uHealth,2019
3. Birth Outcomes Among Older Mothers in Rural Versus Urban Areas: A Residence-Based Approach;Lisonkova;J. Rural. Health,2011
4. Kent, S.T., McClure, L.A., Zaitchik, B.F., and Gohlke, J.M. (2013). Area-level risk factors for adverse birth outcomes: Trends in urban and rural settings. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 13.
5. Place of Residence and Inequities in Adverse Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes in India;Dongarwar;Int. J. Matern. Child Health AIDS,2020
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献