Affiliation:
1. School of Nursing, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
2. College of Social Work, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
Abstract
Very little is known about contraceptive behavior in Appalachia, a large geographic region in the eastern United States where even basic prevalence estimates of contraceptive use/nonuse are lacking. This study characterizes contraceptive behavior among Appalachians, including contraceptive use, reasons for use, and methods used; contraceptive nonuse and reasons for nonuse; and attitudes about contraception, including acceptability. This is a secondary analysis of a subsample of survey data collected on sexual and reproductive health attitudes, behaviors, and needs among reproductive-age women (18–49 years) living in the Appalachian region (n = 332). Results identify rates of contraceptive use (66.6%) and nonuse (33.1%) among Appalachian residents. Methods used most frequently included those that did not require prescription (i.e., external condoms and natural family planning methods) though many reported the use of intrauterine devices (IUDs). Among nonusers, fear of side effects from contraception and ambivalence towards pregnancy were most commonly selected as the most important reason for not using contraception. Contraception was considered acceptable by this sample overall, and these acceptability attitudes were significantly associated with contraceptive behavior.
Funder
Society of Family Planning
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference41 articles.
1. Swan, L.E.T., Auerbach, S.L., Ely, G.E., Agbemenu, K., Mencia, J., and Araf, N.R. (2020). Family Planning Practices in Appalachia: Focus Group Perspectives on Service Needs in the Context of Regional Substance Abuse. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.
2. Morrone, M., and Buckley, G.L. (2011). Mountains of Injustice: Social and Environmental Justice in Appalachia, Ohio University Press.
3. HPV vaccination among adolescent females from Appalachia: Implications for cervical cancer disparities;Reiter;Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.,2012
4. Guttmacher Institute (2023, September 01). Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe 2023. Available online: https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/.
5. “I wouldn’t even know where to start”: Unwanted pregnancy and abortion decision-making in Central Appalachia;Goldberg;Reprod. Health Matters,2018