Diabetes Mellitus Family Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

Author:

Soares Vânia LídiaORCID,Lemos SaraORCID,Barbieri-Figueiredo Maria do CéuORCID,Morais Maria Carminda SoaresORCID,Sequeira CarlosORCID

Abstract

Although many instruments are used to assess the families of people with diabetes, their measurement properties have not been systematically reviewed. We aimed to identify and evaluate the psychometric properties of the instruments used to assess family functioning in adults with diabetes. Methods: A systematic literature review, according to the JBI systematic reviews of measurement properties, was conducted using different databases, including gray literature. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021239733. Two independent reviewers searched, screened, and assessed the risk of bias among the articles according to the COSMIN methodology. The quality of each included instrument was assessed using the updated criteria for good measurement properties. Results: Eighty-one studies were included, and thirty-one eligible instruments were identified. The psychometric properties frequently assessed were structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity. Conclusions: Although 31 instruments were included, none of their psychometric properties were scored as “very good”. From the instruments scored as adequate on development and content validity, five stood out for their quality appraisal.. The development of new instruments is not recommended. More studies should be conducted on the existing instruments to assess the less commonly evaluated psychometric properties. Using valid instruments to develop and evaluate interventions is essential to promote health literacy and the effectiveness of diabetes management.

Funder

University of Huelva/CBUA

National Funds FCT—Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference100 articles.

1. International Diabetes Federation (2021). IDF Diabetes Atlas, International Diabetes Federation. [10th ed.].

2. Meleis, A.I. (2018). Theoretical Nursing: Development and Progress, Wolters Kluwer. [6th ed.].

3. Kaakinen, J., Coehlo, D., Steele, R., and Robinson, M. (2018). Family Health Care Nursing: Theory, Practice and Research, F. A. Davis Company. [6th ed.].

4. Shajan, Z., and Snell, D. (2019). Wright & Leahey’s. Nurses and Families: A Guide to Family Assessment and Intervention, F. A. Davis Company.

5. World Health Organization (2013). Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013–2020, World Health Organization.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mapping the terrain: A comprehensive exploration of health literacy among youth;Journal of Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan;2023-12-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3