Measuring the Effectiveness of Food Policy Councils in Major Cities in the United States

Author:

Range Camille1,O’Hara Sabine1,Jeffery Tia1ORCID,Toussaint Etienne C.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Agriculture, Urban Sustainability and Environmental Sciences (CAUSES), University of the District of Columbia (UDC), Washington, DC 20008, USA

2. School of Law, University of South Carolina, 1525 Senate Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA

Abstract

The United States food system is comprised of a diversity of stakeholders representing a range of sectors including agriculture, health, hospitality, and other sectors of the economy. Coordinating these wide-ranging aspects of the food system is a challenging responsibility of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and its counterparts at the state and county level. While the USDA acknowledges the institutional importance of diversity, it has only recently begun to meaningfully consider the agricultural needs of urban environments, the unique experiences from communities of color, and opportunities for urban agriculture in its purview. This study provides a framework for food systems leaders, specifically in food policy councils (FPCs) in large urban communities, to assess the visibility and effectiveness of their diversity and inclusion initiatives represented across three key domains: (1) leadership and governance structures, (2) key stakeholder engagement strategies, and (3) advance food justice. A cluster analysis of the study results for FPCs in 19 U.S. cities and metropolitan areas across these three domains revealed four distinct groups of food policy councils. Results from the assessment of the urban FPCs reveal that they succeed in embedding diversity and inclusion in all three diversity measures, with key stakeholder engagement receiving the highest score at 73%. On average, FPCs received a score of 54% when assessing diversity and inclusion in their leadership and governance and a score of 49% in their activities to advance food justice. Results of the analysis also highlights opportunities to improve individual, thematic, and cumulative scores. Participation from food systems leadership groups such as food policy councils will be vital in advocating for equitable food systems through urban producer and consumer programs in the upcoming reauthorization of the U.S. farm bill in 2024.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Plant Science,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science),Microbiology,Food Science

Reference61 articles.

1. (2023, April 05). United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Available online: https://www.usda.gov/our-agency/about-usda.

2. United States Department of Agriculture (2023, March 11). Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility Strategic Plan Fiscal Year 2022–2026, Available online: https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/usda-deia-strategic-plan.pdf.

3. Valuing Socio-Diversity;Int. J. Soc. Econ.,1995

4. Reed, M., and Price, M. (2020). UNESCO Biosphere Reserves: Supporting Biocultural Diversity, Sustainability and Society, Routledge.

5. Knowledge exchange processes in multicultural teams: Linking organizational diversity climates to teams’ effectiveness;Hajro;Acad. Manag. J.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3