Affiliation:
1. Agroindustrial Research Group (GRAIN), Faculty of Agroindustrial Engineering, School of Engineering, Pontificia Bolivariana University, Medellín P.O. Box 050004, Colombia
2. Technology and Innovation Management Research Group, Centre for Basic Science, School of Engineering, Pontificia Bolivariana University, Medellín P.O. Box 050004, Colombia
Abstract
The objective of this systematic review was to identify and classify, from the available literature, non-conventional feed ingredients from terrestrial plants, animals, algae, and fungi which have been evaluated for their potential use for tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) production. For this purpose, 795 papers published in the Scopus and Web of Science databases between 2011 and 2021 were analyzed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Data on the growth rate (GR) and effects on weight gain (WG), specific growth rate (SGR) and feed conversion ratio (FCR); digestibility; fatty acid profile (FAP) of the fish carcass; and the survival rate (SR) were compiled in databases and summary tables. The results were refined according to different criteria, obtaining 144 documents that were pertinent for an in-depth analysis. From those, we found that 50.7% evaluated terrestrial plants, 22.2% animals, 13.9% algae, 9% fungi, and the remaining, combinations of some of the above categories. From the summarized results we concluded that most of the non-conventional sources analyzed have a positive potential impact as alternatives for producing tilapia. Survival was the most evaluated parameter, while digestibility was the least evaluated parameter.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología of Colombia
Subject
Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference145 articles.
1. FAO (2022). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022, Towards Blue Transformation; FAO.
2. OECD, and FAO (2021). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook, OECD.
3. FAO (2022). Versión Resumida de El Estado Mundial de la Pesca y la Acuicultura 2022, FAO. Hacia la Transformación azul.
4. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews;Page;BMJ,2021
5. PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews;Rethlefsen;Syst. Rev.,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献