Deriving a Continuous Point of Departure for Skin Sensitization Risk Assessment Using a Bayesian Network Model

Author:

Tourneix Fleur1,Carron Leopold1ORCID,Jouffe Lionel2ORCID,Hoffmann Sebastian3ORCID,Alépée Nathalie1

Affiliation:

1. L’Oréal, Research & Innovation, 1Eugène Schueller, 93600 Aulnay-sous-Bois, France

2. Bayesia S.A.S., Parc Cérès, Bâtiment N 21, rue Ferdinand Buisson, 53810 Changé, France

3. seh consulting + services, Stembergring 15, 33106 Paderborn, Germany

Abstract

Regulations of cosmetic ingredients and products have been the most advanced in embracing new approach methodologies (NAMs). Consequently, the cosmetic industry has assumed a forerunner role in the development and implementation of animal-free next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) that incorporates defined approaches (DAs) to assess the skin sensitization potency of ingredients. A Bayesian network DA predicting four potency categories (SkinSens-BN) was constructed against reference Local Lymph Node Assay data for a total of 297 substances, achieving a predictive performance similar to that of other DAs. With the aim of optimally informing risk assessment with a continuous point of departure (PoD), a weighted sum of the SkinSens-BN probabilities for four potency classes (non-, weak, moderate, and strong/extreme sensitizer) was calculated, using fixed weights based on associated LLNA EC3-values. The approach was promising, e.g., the derived PoDs for substances classified as non-sensitizers did not overlap with any others and 77% of PoDs were similar or more conservative than LLNA EC3. In addition, the predictions were assigned a level of confidence based on the probabilities to inform the evaluation of uncertainty in an NGRA context. In conclusion, the PoD derivation approach can substantially contribute to reliable skin sensitization NGRAs.

Funder

L’Oréal

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference53 articles.

1. (2009). European Commission Regulation

2. (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European parliament and the council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. Off. J. Eur. Union, L342, 59-209.

3. SCCS (2023). The SCCS Notes of Guidance for the Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients and Their Safety Evaluation, SCCS. 12th Revision; SCCS/1647/22.

4. Gądarowska, D., Kalka, J., Daniel-Wójcik, A., and Mrzyk, I. (2022). Alternative Methods for Skin-Sensitization Assessment. Toxics, 10.

5. OECD (2014). The Adverse Outcome Pathway for Skin Sensitisation Initiated by Covalent Binding to Proteins, OECD.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3