Comparison of Patients with Reduced and Mildly Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Intermediate Data from the FAR NHL Registry

Author:

Trčková Alžběta,Špinarová LenkaORCID,Špinar Jindřich,Pařenica Jiří,Málek Filip,Špinarová MonikaORCID,Ludka Ondřej,Krejčí Jan,Jarkovský Jiří,Benešová Klára,Lábr KarelORCID

Abstract

Introduction: We present the results of a study by the Pharmacology and NeuroHumoral Activation Registry (FAR NHL), which collects data on patients with chronic heart failure. The register contains 1088 patients from three workplaces in the Czech Republic which specialize in the care of patients with heart failure. Objectives: The aim was to obtain a comparison of pharmacotherapy and the incidence of comorbidities in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) versus patients with mid-range (or newly mildly reduced) ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Methods: Patients with a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% were included and divided into HFrEF with EF below 40% and HFmrEF with EF 40–49%, according to the 2016 ESC Guidelines. In addition to the clinical condition, we also monitored laboratory parameters, comorbidities and pharmacotherapy in the patients. Results: Patients with HFrEF versus HFmrEF are more likely to be male (p < 0.008), younger (p < 0.001), have lower systolic blood pressure and are less likely to have ischemic etiology of heart failure (p < 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in the proportion of comorbidities: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, ischemic lower limb disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There were no differences in the proportion of smokers and non-smokers between the groups. Patients with HFrEF have a higher class of New York Heart Association (NYHA), a level of N-terminal fraction of natriuretic peptide B (NT-proBNP), and a higher level of urea and uric acid. They are more often treated with loop diuretics or mineral corticosteroid receptor (MRA) blockers and less often with thiazides (p < 0.001), and also have a worse two-year prognosis. Conclusion: Compared to patients with HFmrEF, patients with HFrEF have more severe heart failure, more pronounced neurohumoral activation and a worse prognosis. They do not differ in the presence of comorbidities.

Funder

Masaryk University

the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference24 articles.

1. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure;Ponikowski;Eur. Heart J.,2016

2. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure;McDonagh;Eur. Heart J.,2021

3. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines;Heidenreich;Circulation,2022

4. Comorbidities, Fragility, and Quality of Life in Heart Failure Patients with Midrange Ejection Fraction;Gastelurrutia;Mayo Clin. Proc. Innov. Qual Outcomes,2018

5. Non-Cardiac Comorbidities in Heart Failure with Reduced, Mid-Range and Preserved Ejection Fraction;Streng;Int. J. Cardiol.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3