When the Anomalistic, Draconitic and Sidereal Orbital Periods Do Not Coincide: The Impact of Post-Keplerian Perturbing Accelerations

Author:

Iorio Lorenzo1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ministero dell’ Istruzione e del Merito, Viale Unità di Italia 68, I-70125 Bari, Italy

Abstract

In a purely Keplerian picture, the anomalistic, draconitic and sidereal orbital periods of a test particle orbiting a massive body coincide with each other. Such degeneracy is removed when post-Keplerian perturbing acceleration enters the equations of motion, yielding generally different corrections to the Keplerian period for the three aforementioned characteristic orbital timescales. They are analytically worked out in the case of the accelerations induced by the general relativistic post-Newtonian gravitoelectromagnetic fields and, to the Newtonian level, by the oblateness of the central body. The resulting expressions hold for completely general orbital configurations and spatial orientations of the spin axis of the primary. Astronomical systems characterized by extremely accurate measurements of orbital periods like transiting exoplanets and binary pulsars may offer potentially viable scenarios for measuring such post-Keplerian features of motion, at least in principle. As an example, the sidereal period of the brown dwarf WD1032 + 011 b is currently known with an uncertainty as small as ≃10−5s, while its predicted post-Newtonian gravitoelectric correction amounts to 0.07s; however, the accuracy with which the Keplerian period can be calculated is just 572 s. For double pulsar PSR J0737–3039, the largest relativistic correction to the anomalistic period amounts to a few tenths of a second, given a measurement error of such a characteristic orbital timescale as small as ≃10−6s. On the other hand, the Keplerian term can be currently calculated just to a ≃9 s accuracy. In principle, measuring at least two of the three characteristic orbital periods for the same system independently would cancel out their common Keplerian component, provided that their difference is taken into account.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference73 articles.

1. Pascual-Sánchez, J.F., Floría, L., San Miguel, A., and Vicente, F. (2001). Gravitoelectromagnetism. Reference Frames and Gravitomagnetism, World Scientific.

2. Iorio, L. (2007). Gravitoelectromagnetism: A Brief Review. The Measurement of Gravitomagnetism: A Challenging Enterprise, Nova Science.

3. Capderou, M. (2005). Satellites: Orbits and Missions, Springer.

4. Post–Keplerian corrections to the orbital periods of a two–body system and their measurability;Iorio;Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.,2016

5. Deeg, H.J., and Belmonte, J.A. (2018). Handbook of Exoplanets, Springer.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3