A Scientometric Review of Environmental Valuation Research with an Altmetric Pathway for the Future

Author:

Olukolajo Michael Ayodele1ORCID,Oyetunji Abiodun Kolawole234ORCID,Amaechi Chiemela Victor456ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Estate Management, Federal University of Technology, Akure 340252, Nigeria

2. Department of Estate Management, University of Benin, Benin City 300287, Nigeria

3. Lancaster Environment Centre (LEC), Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK

4. Department of Construction Management, Global Banking School (GBS Manchester Campus), Bath Spa University (Partnership), Devonshire Street North, Manchester M12 6JH, UK

5. School of Engineering, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YR, UK

6. Institute of Sustainable Energy, Universiti Tenaga Nasional (The National Energy University), Jalan IKRAM-UNITEN, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia

Abstract

Environmental valuation (EV) research has advanced significantly as a method of assigning value to environmental goods, many of which lack readily discernible market values. The term “environmental valuation” describes a number of methods for putting monetary values on environmental effects, particularly non-market effects. Over the years, there has been a continuous increase in the number of publications on the topic. According to searches via the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases, the phrase “environmental valuation” first occurred in 1987. The current research examines patterns in publishing rates over the previous three decades to analyse environmental valuation activity. To identify the future pathway, a research pattern was identified using Scopus, WoS, and the Altmetric Explorer. The data were postprocessed using VOSviewer to identify the mapping networks; then, Voyant Tools were used to explore the keywords. A summary of the demand for environmental valuation is also provided based on the literature review. However, the findings of this historical analysis indicate that despite the academic efforts on this subject, environmental valuation is not used in research as much as one may anticipate. In addition, the study gives a general outline of the future directions that environmental valuation research is anticipated to follow in light of the current academic research initiatives as well as academic market and policy market research efforts. The study shows that the United Kingdom (UK) showed the highest publications by location in this field. Additionally, the study shows that the choice experiment approach is preferred over the contingent valuation method, and this work illustrates this preference. It also demonstrates that only a small number of papers have had a significant influence on the researchers in this field.

Funder

Lancaster University

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Niger Delta Development Commission

Tertiary Education Trust Fund

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Environmental Science,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference133 articles.

1. Dixon, J.A. (February, January 31). Environmental Valuation: Challenges and Practices. Proceedings of the Economics and Conservation in the Tropics: A Strategic Dialogue, Washington DC, USA. Available online: https://www.conservation-strategy.org/sites/default/files/field-file/Tropics_Conference_Dixon_Environmenal_Valuation.pdf.

2. Interview Effects in an Environmental Valuation Telephone Survey;Gong;Environ. Resour. Econ.,2010

3. Assessing the willingness to pay for reliable domestic water supply via catchment management: Results from a contingent valuation survey in Nairobi City, Kenya;Balana;J. Environ. Plan. Manag.,2013

4. Estimating willingness to pay for desalinated seawater: The case of Djerba Island, Tunisia;Besrour;Int. J. Water Resour. Dev.,2017

5. Tesoriere, G., and Scuderi, R. (2022). Willingness to pay for water in secondary cities: Do poverty and negative experiences matter?. Dev. Pract., 1–12.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3