Abstract
An innovative and integrative modeling strategy for assessing the sustainability and resilience of social-ecological systems (SES) is presented by introducing a social-ecological entropy production (SEEP) method. In analogy to the thermodynamic entropy production of irreversible processes, we discuss a theoretical model that relates energy and information flow with the cultural and epistemological peculiarities of different communities that exploit the same natural resource. One of the innovative aspects of our approach comes from the fact that sustainability is assessed by a single parameter (SEEP) incorporating the simulation outcomes of all the populations participating in the dynamics, and not only on the fate of the resource. This is significant as far as the non-linearities introduced by the coupling of the different dynamics considered may lead to high sensitivity to small perturbations. Specifically, by assuming two possible types of technical and environmental knowledge-transfer methods [direct (D) and phase-in (P)] within each one of the two communities that exploit and restore a resource, we generate four mathematical models to explore the long-term sustainability scenario due to the intervention, by a new epistemological community, of an initially sustainable resource-community SES. By exploring the space of four key parameters characterizing the degree of technical and environmental knowledge, as well as the rates of social inclusion and knowledge transfer, our simulations show that, from 400 scenarios studied in each case, the P-P model predicts 100% sustainable cases in the use of the resource after the intervention by the second community. The mixed scenarios P-D and D-P predict about 29%, and the D-D scenario only predicts 23% of sustainable cases. Catastrophic outcomes are predicted at about 71% in P-D and D-P scenarios, and about 77% of extinction of the system by exhaustion of the resource and community populations in the D-D scenario. In this form, our theoretical strategy and the knowledge-transfer scenarios studied may help policymakers to find a priori science-based criteria to solve possible controversies arising from social-ecological interventions.
Reference33 articles.
1. Nielsen, S.N., Fath, B.D., Bastianoni, S., Marques, J.C., Müller, F., Patten, B.C., Ulanowicz, R.E., Tiezzi, E., and Jorgensen S, E. A New Ecology: Systems Perspective, 2020.
2. Fiscus, D.A., and Fath, B.D. Foundations for Sustainability: A Coherent Framework of Life-Environment Relations, 2019.
3. Modeling sustainability: Population, inequality, consumption, and bidirectional coupling of the Earth and Human Systems;Motesharrei;Natl. Sci. Rev.,2016
4. Human and nature dynamics (HANDY): Modeling inequality and use of resources in the collapse or sustainability of societies;Motesharrei;Ecol. Econ.,2014
5. Bidirectional coupling between the Earth and human systems is essential for modeling sustainability;Fu;Natl. Sci. Rev.,2016
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献