Exploring Perception of Warning Labels: Insights from Color, Signal Words, and Symbol Evaluation

Author:

Gopang Miskeen Ali1ORCID,Ali Tauha Hussain2,Shaikh Shakeel Ahmed1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan

2. Department of Civil Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan

Abstract

Protecting people from the risks associated with products is a critical concern in today’s economy. Pakistan, being the world’s fifth most populous country, lacks the framework of warning labels and therefore faces a significant gap in product warning labels. Pakistan is a representative of a number of countries that export a variety of products to Pakistan; however, warning labels on these goods are typically in English, which might mislead people of Pakistan in perceiving the hazard level. It is therefore imperative to conduct research into the non-textual and cross-cultural understanding of labels from the perspective of Pakistan. This study examined the applicability of ANSI Z535.4 in the context of Pakistan. A total of 66 (34 male and 32 female) undergraduate students with a mean age of 20.5 participated in this study. A meticulous experiment was designed using a nine-point rating scale with anchors on both sides, where one represented ‘not at all hazardous’ and nine represented ‘extremely hazardous’. Participants rated each component of warning labels, i.e., color, symbol, signal words, and their complex configurations. The results showed alignment with the ANSI Z535.4 standards for some components (i.e., colors, symbols, and signal words) and complex configurations, whereas no significant difference was found in perceived hazard levels between green (M = 3.167), blue (M = 3.591, and yellow (M = 3.652) colors, with a p-value greater than 0.05. Participants did not differentiate significantly between signal words, i.e., caution (M = 5.182) and warning (M = 5.879). Participants also did not differentiate significantly between complex configurations, i.e., safety alert–caution–yellow (M = 5.076) and safety alert–warning–orange (M = 5.197), with p-values greater than 0.05. These results state that discrepancies in the perception of warning labels exist. This study is the first of its kind conducted in the context of Pakistan, which will help policy makers to consider the findings before implementing a policy. In fact, differences in perception could result in failure to take appropriate precautions. Nonetheless, these nuances can be overcome with proper awareness through training for the people.

Funder

Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference47 articles.

1. UNCTAD (2017). Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals through Consumer Protection, UNCTAD.

2. Consumer Behaviour towards Storage, Disposal and Recycling of e-Waste: Systematic Review and Future Research Prospects;Thukral;Benchmarking,2023

3. UNCTAD (2018). Trade and Development Board Consumer Product Safety United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, UNCTAD.

4. Gopang, M.A., Ali, T.H., and Shaikh, S.A. (2023, January 14). Assessing Hazard Level Perception of Colors: A Comparative Study with ANSI Recommendations. Proceedings of the 2nd Australian International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Melbourne, Australia.

5. Wogalter, M.S. (2006). Consumer Product Warnings: Research and Recommendations. Handbook of Warnings, CRC Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3