Between Leisure and Pressure—Veterinarians’ Attitudes towards the Care of Competition Horses in Germany, Austria and Switzerland

Author:

Springer Svenja1ORCID,Mihatsch Denise Isabell2,Grimm Herwig1,Jenner Florien3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, Messerli Research Institute, Unit of Ethics and Human-Animal-Studies, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria

2. Department of Companion Animals and Horses, Equine Hospital, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria

3. Department of Companion Animals and Horses, Equine Hospital, Equine Surgery Unit, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Equine veterinarians face a range of challenges when attending competition horses. Athletic goals may significantly impact veterinary decision making, and the veterinarian’s work can be complicated by reputational considerations and rival opinions during an assessment of whether a horse is “fit to compete”. Using an online questionnaire, we found that the majority of German, Austrian and Swiss equine veterinarians (N = 172) surveyed agreed that the owners of competition horses are more likely than owners of leisure horses to approach them with clear treatment ideas, and that the former have higher expectations of the medical services provided. The data also show that the veterinarian’s reputation plays a more important role in the competition sphere. Using a case vignette, we established that, on the grounds of equine welfare, the majority of respondents indicated that they would decide against starting a dressage horse with low-grade lameness in a competition. Those respondents who indicated that they would approve a start of the dressage horse indicated that a horse with a low-grade lameness was fit enough “to compete”. We conclude that clearer definitions of phrases, such as “fit to compete”, may be helpful in guiding veterinarians as they discharge their professional responsibilities during competitions and reduce the reputational stress they experience in this working context.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference35 articles.

1. Jones, E. (2023, March 07). “A Wake-Up Call”: 20% of Public Do Not Support Horses in Sport, Survey Finds. Available online: https://www.horseandhound.co.uk/news/a-wake-up-call-20-of-public-do-not-support-horses-in-sport-survey-finds-792741.

2. Bull, A. (2023, March 07). Modern Pentathlon Was at Risk Long before a Horse Was Punched. How to Update It?. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2021/nov/03/modern-pentathlon-horse-punched-olympics.

3. Coulter, K. (2023, March 07). Saint Boy’s Rebellion Spurs Debate about Ethical Treatment of Horses at the Olympics—And Beyond. Available online: https://theconversation.com/saint-boys-rebellion-spurs-debate-about-ethical-treatment-of-horses-at-the-olympics-and-beyond-166472.

4. Elder, L. (2023, March 07). Horse Sport Must Demonstrate Sound Ethics to Survive. Available online: https://www.horseandhound.co.uk/news/horse-sport-must-demonstrate-sound-ethics-to-survive-769969.

5. Newkey-Burden, C. (2023, March 07). Equestrian Sports Have an Animal Cruelty Problem–Dressage Should Be Banned from the Olympics. Available online: https://inews.co.uk/opinion/equestrian-sports-dressage-animal-cruelty-horses-banned-from-olympics-1135216.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3