Systematic Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Medical and Surgical Specialties: Quality, Evaluation, Evidence, and Enforcement

Author:

Rahman Eqram1ORCID,Rao Parinitha2,Abu-Farsakh Hany Niamey3ORCID,Thonse Chirag4,Ali Imran5,Upton Alice E.1ORCID,Baratikkae Shwetha Y.6,Carruthers Jean D. A.7,Mosahebi Ash8,Heidari Nima91011ORCID,Webb William Richard1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research and Innovation Hub, Innovation Aesthetics, London WC2H 9JQ, UK

2. The Skin Address, Aesthetic Dermatology Practice, Bengaluru 560080, India

3. Istishari Hospital, Amman 840431, Jordan

4. Manipal Hospital, Millers Road, Bengaluru 560052, India

5. Integrated Medical Centre, Crawford Street, London WIU 6BE, UK

6. Jansithaa Fertility Centre & Hospital, Bengaluru 560079, India

7. Department of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada

8. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Hampstead NW3 2QG, UK

9. Medical Supercomputation and Machine Learning, European Quantum Medical, London E10 5NP, UK

10. Foot, Ankle and Limb Reconstruction, Orthopaedic Surgeon, London W1G 7ET, UK

11. Pharmacy, Science and Technology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania

Abstract

Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is widely used in various medical and surgical specialties for its regenerative properties, including aesthetics (facial rejuvenation, hair restoration, and skin tightening) and orthopedics (treatment of tendinitis and osteoarthritis). However, the inconsistent literature on PRP’s efficacy and safety leads to critical knowledge gaps. This systematic review evaluates quality control measures in PRP preparation and application and explores the regulatory environment governing its clinical use. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, for studies published from January 2020 to April 2024. The review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving human participants undergoing PRP treatment for aesthetic or regenerative purposes. Key parameters such as the PRP preparation methods, platelet concentration, and quality control measures were analyzed. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024557669). Results: Out of 75 RCTs involving 5726 patients, the review identified significant variability in PRP preparation methods and application techniques, including differences in centrifugation protocols and platelet concentration levels. A new evidence-based scoring system, the William–Eqram Scoring System for PRP Quality Reporting (WESS-PQR), was proposed to address these inconsistencies. Correlation analysis revealed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.79) between proper temperature control during preparation and PRP efficacy. Initial platelet count assessment showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.57) with efficacy. Conclusions: Standardized PRP preparation protocols and robust regulatory frameworks are urgently needed to ensure the safety and efficacy of PRP treatments. The proposed WESS-PQR scoring system can serve as a valuable tool for clinicians and researchers, promoting consistency and reliability in PRP applications.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3