Affiliation:
1. Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2. Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, and University Hospital Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
3. Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical Imaging Cluster (MIC), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
Abstract
Additive manufacturing and 3D printing allow for the design and rapid production of radiographic phantoms for X-ray imaging, including CT. These are used for numerous purposes, such as patient simulation, optimization of imaging procedures and dose levels, system evaluation and quality assurance. However, standard 3D printing polymers do not mimic X-ray attenuation properties of tissues like soft, adipose, lung or bone tissue, and standard materials like liquid water. The mass density of printing polymers—especially important in CT—is often inappropriate, i.e., mostly too high. Different methods can be applied to reduce mass density. This work examines reducing density by controlled underfilling either realized by using 3D printing materials expanded through foaming during heating in the printing process, or reducing polymer flow to introduce microscopic air-filled voids. The achievable density reduction depends on the base polymer used. When using foaming materials, density is controlled by the extrusion temperature, and ranges from 33 to 47% of the base polymer used, corresponding to a range of −650 to −394 HU in CT with 120 kV. Standard filaments (Nylon, modified PLA and modified ABS) allowed density reductions by 20 to 25%, covering HU values in CT from −260 to 77 (Nylon), −230 to −20 (ABS) and −81 to 143 (PLA). A standard chalk-filled PLA filament allowed reproduction of bone tissue in a wide range of bone mineral content resulting in CT numbers from 57 to 460 HU. Controlled underfilling allowed the production of radiographic phantom materials with continuously adjustable attenuation in a limited but appropriate range, allowing for the reproduction of X-ray attenuation properties of water, adipose, soft, lung, and bone tissue in an accurate, predictable and reproducible manner.
Reference53 articles.
1. A Systematic Review on 3D-Printed Imaging and Dosimetry Phantoms in Radiation Therapy;Tino;Technol. Cancer Res. Treat.,2019
2. Recent advances on the development of phantoms using 3D printing for imaging with CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound;Filippou;Med. Phys.,2018
3. Patient dosimetry activities in the United States: The nationwide evaluation of X-ray trends (NEXT) and tissue dose handbooks;Suleiman;Appl. Radiat. Isot.,1999
4. IAEA (2007). Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology: An International Code of Practice, IAEA.
5. Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality;Smet;Eur. Radiol.,2018