Affiliation:
1. International Policing and Public Protection Research Institute (IPPPRI), Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), Bishop Hall Ln, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK
Abstract
Non-violent (vocal) extremists are at the centre of inflamed debates in the UK as they use their freedom of speech to legally oppose key democratic values and national authorities while targeting specific groups in the society as alleged enemies. This paper aims to explore the radicalisation pathways of individuals in the UK who hold radical and extreme ideas but who have not (yet) committed any offence. More precisely, this paper aims to uncover the role (if any) played by non-violent extremist groups in pathways to radicalisation. To do so, this paper focuses on people supported by the Channel programme, the main early de-radicalisation programme within the Prevent Scheme. This paper innovatively uses first-hand data reflecting the views of Channel practitioners on radicalisation pathways. This study concludes that non-violent extremist groups (as structures) still play a role in familiarising/acculturating individuals with specific ideological concepts. However, the processes of identity building and resource mobilisation seem to be strongly agent-led when observing Channel population in the UK.
Reference67 articles.
1. Technological Seduction and Self-Radicalization;Alfano;Journal of the American Philosophical Association,2018
2. Social Identity Theory for Investigating Islamic Extremism in the Diaspora;Journal of Strategic Security,2013
3. Fighting the War of Ideas;Baran;Foreign Affairs,2005
4. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment;Benford;Annual Review of Sociology,2000
5. Berger, Pete L., and Luckmann, Thomas (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Doubleday.