“Groups Are Still a Problem … but a Different One!”: Reflecting on the Role Played by Non-Violent Extremist Groups in the Radicalisation Pathways of Individuals in the UK

Author:

Orofino Elisa1

Affiliation:

1. International Policing and Public Protection Research Institute (IPPPRI), Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), Bishop Hall Ln, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK

Abstract

Non-violent (vocal) extremists are at the centre of inflamed debates in the UK as they use their freedom of speech to legally oppose key democratic values and national authorities while targeting specific groups in the society as alleged enemies. This paper aims to explore the radicalisation pathways of individuals in the UK who hold radical and extreme ideas but who have not (yet) committed any offence. More precisely, this paper aims to uncover the role (if any) played by non-violent extremist groups in pathways to radicalisation. To do so, this paper focuses on people supported by the Channel programme, the main early de-radicalisation programme within the Prevent Scheme. This paper innovatively uses first-hand data reflecting the views of Channel practitioners on radicalisation pathways. This study concludes that non-violent extremist groups (as structures) still play a role in familiarising/acculturating individuals with specific ideological concepts. However, the processes of identity building and resource mobilisation seem to be strongly agent-led when observing Channel population in the UK.

Funder

Anglia Ruskin University

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference67 articles.

1. Technological Seduction and Self-Radicalization;Alfano;Journal of the American Philosophical Association,2018

2. Social Identity Theory for Investigating Islamic Extremism in the Diaspora;Journal of Strategic Security,2013

3. Fighting the War of Ideas;Baran;Foreign Affairs,2005

4. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment;Benford;Annual Review of Sociology,2000

5. Berger, Pete L., and Luckmann, Thomas (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Doubleday.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3