Affiliation:
1. Department of Fire Protection Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
Abstract
In this work, a series of laboratory surface fire experiments were performed over a pine needle fuel bed to investigate the effectiveness of a firebreak and the behaviors of a surface fire across a firebreak. Seven wind velocities of 0~3.0 m/s and six firebreak widths of 10~35 cm are varied. The behaviors of a surface fire across the firebreak, the heat flux received by fuel surface and fuel temperature before and after the firebreak are analyzed and compared simultaneously. The main conclusions are as follows: the behaviors of a surface fire spreading across a firebreak under different wind velocities are classified into three categories—no ignition, ignition by flame contact and ignition by spot fires. When the wind velocity is not more than 1.0 m/s, the surface fire cannot successfully cross the firebreak; as wind velocity changes from 1.5 m/s to 2.5 m/s, the fuel after the firebreak can be ignited by flame contact for relatively narrow firebreak conditions; when the wind velocity increases to 3.0 m/s, the burning fuel can be blown away along the fuel bed, and the fuel behind the firebreak will be ignited by spot fire. A linear relationship between the threshold of firebreak width and the fireline intensity is obtained, and the linear fitting coefficient in this paper is larger than the results reported by Wilson (0.36). For no ignition conditions, the fuel temperature and the heat flux received by the fuel after firebreak are significantly lower than those before the firebreak, whereas their variations over time are similar to those before the firebreak for ignition conditions. Moreover, for no ignition conditions, the maximum fuel temperature and the heat flux after the firebreak increase with wind velocity, but decrease with firebreak width. Additionally, when the fuel temperature (253 °C) and the heat flux received by the fuel considering the radiation and convection (43 kW/m2) after firebreak exceed a threshold value, the surface fire can successfully cross the firebreak.
Funder
National Key R&D Program of China
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Sichuan Science and Technology Program
Reference33 articles.
1. Modelling forest fire and firebreak scenarios in a mediterranean mountainous catchment: Impacts on sediment loads;Thomas;J. Environ. Manag.,2021
2. Viegas, D.X., Simeoni, A., Xanthopoulos, G., Rossa, C., Ribeiro, L.M., Pita, L.P., Stipanicev, D., Zinoviev, A., Weber, R., and Dold, J. (2009). Recent Forest Fire Related Accidents in Europe, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
3. Analysis of forest fire fatalities in southern Europe: Spain, Portugal, Greece and Sardinia (Italy);Xanthopoulos;Int. J. Wildland Fire,2019
4. How to build a firebreak to stop smouldering peat fire: Insights from a laboratory-scale study;Lin;Int. J. Wildland Fire,2021
5. Rothermel, R.C. (1972). A Mathematical Model for Predicting Fire Spread in Wild Land Fuels.