Optimization Approach for Multisensory Feedback in Robot-Assisted Pouring Task
-
Published:2024-04-18
Issue:4
Volume:13
Page:152
-
ISSN:2076-0825
-
Container-title:Actuators
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Actuators
Author:
Marambe Mandira S.1, Duerstock Bradley S.12ORCID, Wachs Juan P.2
Affiliation:
1. Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA 2. School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Abstract
Individuals with disabilities and persons operating in inaccessible environments can greatly benefit from the aid of robotic manipulators in performing daily living activities and other remote tasks. Users relying on robotic manipulators to interact with their environment are restricted by the lack of sensory information available through traditional operator interfaces. These interfaces deprive users of somatosensory feedback that would typically be available through direct contact. Multimodal sensory feedback can bridge these perceptual gaps effectively. Given a set of object properties (e.g., temperature, weight) to be conveyed and sensory modalities (e.g., visual, haptic) available, it is necessary to determine which modality should be assigned to each property for an effective interface design. The goal of this study was to develop an effective multisensory interface for robot-assisted pouring tasks, which delivers nuanced sensory feedback while permitting the high visual demand necessary for precise teleoperation. To that end, an optimization approach was employed to generate a combination of feedback properties to modality assignments that maximizes effective feedback perception and minimizes cognitive load. A set of screening experiments tested twelve possible individual assignments to form this optimal combination. The resulting perceptual accuracy, load, and user preference measures were input into a cost function. Formulating and solving as a linear assignment problem, a minimum cost combination was generated. Results from experiments evaluating efficacy in practical use cases for pouring tasks indicate that the solution was significantly more effective than no feedback and had considerable advantage over an arbitrary design.
Funder
National Science Foundation Partnerships for Innovation
Reference62 articles.
1. Molinero, M.B., Dagnino, G., Liu, J., Chi, W., Abdelaziz, M.E., Kwok, T.M., Riga, C., and Yang, G.Z. (2019, January 3–8). Haptic Guidance for Robot-Assisted Endovascular Procedures: Implementation and Evaluation on Surgical Simulator. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau, China. 2. Cooperative and mobile manipulation of multiple microscopic objects based on micro-hands and laser-stage control;Ta;Automatica,2018 3. Skaar, S.B., and Ruoff, C.F. (1994). Teleoperation and Robotics in Space, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. 4. Kwon, D.-S., Ryu, J.-H., Lee, P.-M., and Hong, S.-W. (2000, January 24–28). Design of a teleoperation controller for an underwater manipulator. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings, San Francisco, CA, USA. 5. Trevelyan, J., Hamel, W.R., and Kang, S.C. (2016). Handbook of Robotics, Springer International Publishing.
|
|