Knowledge, Acceptance, and Uptake of Family Planning: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Antenatal Care in Ghana

Author:

Zielinski Ruth1ORCID,Abdelnabi Samia1ORCID,Amankwah Georgina2,Kukula Vida A.2,Apetorgbor Veronica2,Awini Elizabeth2,Williams John2ORCID,Moyer Cheryl3,Ghosh Bidisha1,Lori Jody R.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

2. Dodowa Health Research Center, Ghana Health Service, Dodowa P.O. Box DD1, Greater Accra Region, Ghana

3. Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

Abstract

The use of family planning (FP) methods significantly contributes to improved outcomes for mothers and their offspring. However, the use of FP remains low, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. A cluster randomized controlled clinical trial was implemented in Ghana, comparing group antenatal care (ANC) with routine care. The group ANC intervention included eight meetings where the seventh group meeting incorporated information and discussion regarding methods of FP. Data collection occurred at five time points: baseline (T0), 34 weeks’ gestation (T1), 6–12 weeks post birth (T2), 5–8 months post birth, and 11–14 months post birth (T4). At T1, there was a significantly greater increase in the knowledge of FP methods as well as the intention to use FP after the birth among the intervention group. The uptake of FP was significantly higher in the intervention group for all post-birth timepoints except for T4 where the control group had significantly higher rates. The reasons for the diminishing effect are unclear. An increasing uptake of FP methods requires a multifaceted approach that includes increasing accessibility, knowledge, and acceptability as well as addressing societal and cultural norms.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference31 articles.

1. WHO (2024, May 27). Maternal Mortality. Fact Sheets 2024. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality.

2. A global analysis of the determinants of maternal health and transitions in maternal mortality;Souza;Lancet Glob. Health,2024

3. Levels and Causes of Maternal Mortality and Morbidity;Black;Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health: Disease Control Priorities,2016

4. WHO (2024, May 27). Abortion. Fact Sheets 2024. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion.

5. (2024, July 28). World Bank Open Data. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3