Organic and Conventional Farmers’ Mental Health: A Preliminary Study on the Role of Social Psychological Mediators

Author:

David Lucas1ORCID,Streith Michel1,Michaud Audrey2ORCID,Dambrun Michaël13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63037 Clermont-Ferrand, France

2. Unité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores, Institut National de la Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63037 Clermont-Ferrand, France

3. Laboratoire d’Ingénierie des Systèmes Complexes, Institut National de la Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, 63170 Aubière, France

Abstract

The study of farmers’ mental health according to their production model (organic vs. conventional) suggests that organic farming was associated with better mental health than conventional farming. However, to our knowledge, no research has been conducted to examine the social psychological factors responsible for these differences. This research aims to investigate the role of job content and values on farmers’ mental health according to their production model. To this end, an online questionnaire study on these dimensions was conducted on a sample of farmers. The results revealed that organic farmers scored significantly lower in anxiety and higher in positive emotions than conventional farmers. Psychological demand and conformity value appeared to be the most important explanatory factors related to the effect of farmers’ production model on mental health. Implications for the response rate and farmers’ mental health were discussed.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference68 articles.

1. Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., and de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

2. Reducing meat consumption: Identifying group-specific inhibitors using latent profile analysis;Lacroix;Appetite,2019

3. Thakur, S.S., Lone, A.R., Bhattacharyya, S.S., Salehin, S.M.U., Jain, S.K., and Yadav, S. (2023). Conquering the Impact of Climate Change through Organic Farming: A Global Perspective, Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

4. Cristache, S.E., Vuță, M., Marin, E., Cioacă, S.I., and Vuţă, M. (2018). Organic versus conventional farming—A paradigm for the sustainable development of the european countries. Sustainability, 10.

5. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (2021, December 18). Definition of Organic Agriculture. Available online: https://www.ifoam.bio/why-organic/organic-landmarks/definition-organic.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3