Standardization of Semi-Quantitative Dot Blotting Assay—Application in the Diagnosis, Follow-Up, and Relapse of Paracoccidioidomycosis

Author:

Pereira Beatriz Aparecida Soares1ORCID,Cavalcante Ricardo de Souza1,Pereira-Chioccola Vera Lucia2ORCID,Melhem Marcia de Souza Carvalho13ORCID,de Carvalho Lídia Raquel4,Mendes Rinaldo Poncio13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UNESP Botucatu, School of Medicine—Discipline of Infectology, São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo State, Brazil

2. Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo 01246-000, São Paulo State, Brazil

3. FUMS Campo Grande, School of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil

4. Institute of Biosciences—Department of Biodiversity and Biostatistics, UNESP Botucatu, São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo State, Brazil

Abstract

Introduction: This study standardized a semi-quantitative dot blotting assay (DB) and a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to detect specific antibodies for Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and its DNA in PCM patients. Methodology: We evaluated 42 confirmed PCM patients upon admission using a serological double agar gel immunodiffusion test (DID), DB, and molecular tests (qPCR in total blood). The control groups included 42 healthy individuals and 37 patients with other infectious diseases. The serological progress during treatment was evaluated in eight patients, and there was a relapse diagnosis in ten patients using the Pb B.339 strain antigen. The cut-off points for the serological tests were determined by a receiver operator characteristic curve. Results: The DB and DID tests showed similar accuracy, but the DB identified lower antibody concentrations. Cross-reactions were absent in the DB assay. In the relapse diagnoses, DB exhibited much higher sensitivity (90%) than DID (30%). Conclusions: A DB assay is easier and faster than a DID test to be performed; DB and DID tests show the same accuracy, while blood qPCR is not recommended in the diagnosis at the time of admission; cross-reactions were not observed with other systemic diseases; DB and DID tests are useful for treatment monitoring PCM patients; and a DB assay is the choice for diagnosing relapse. These findings support the introduction of semi-quantitative DB assays in clinical laboratories.

Funder

Grad Program in Tropical Diseases—São Paulo State University, UNESP Botucatu, School of Medicine

Publisher

MDPI AG

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3