Affiliation:
1. Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
2. U.S. National Poultry Research Center, USDA-ARS, Athens, GA 30605, USA
3. Livestock Behavior Research Unit, USDA-ARS, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Abstract
Injurious behaviors (i.e., aggressive pecking, feather pecking, and cannibalism) in laying hens are a critical issue facing the egg industry due to increased social stress and related health and welfare issues as well as economic losses. In humans, stress-induced dysbiosis increases gut permeability, releasing various neuroactive factors, causing neuroinflammation and related neuropsychiatric disorders via the microbiota–gut–brain axis, and consequently increasing the frequency and intensity of aggression and violent behaviors. Restoration of the imbalanced gut microbial composition has become a novel treatment strategy for mental illnesses, such as depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, impulsivity, and compulsivity. A similar function of modulating gut microbial composition following stress challenge may be present in egg-laying chickens. The avian cecum, as a multi-purpose organ, has the greatest bacterial biodiversity (bacterial diversity, richness, and species composition) along the gastrointestinal tract, with vitally important functions in maintaining physiological and behavioral homeostasis, especially during the periods of stress. To identify the effects of the gut microbiome on injurious behaviors in egg-laying chickens, we have designed and tested the effects of transferring cecal contents from two divergently selected inbred chicken lines on social stress and stress-related injurious behaviors in recipient chicks of a commercial layer strain. This article reports the outcomes from a multi-year study on the modification of gut microbiota composition to reduce injurious behaviors in egg-laying chickens. An important discovery of this corpus of experiments is that injurious behaviors in chickens can be reduced or inhibited through modifying the gut microbiota composition and brain serotonergic activities via the gut–brain axis, without donor-recipient genetic effects.
Reference230 articles.
1. Review: Trends for meat, milk and egg consumption for the next decades and the role played by livestock systems in the global production of proteins;Henchion;Animal,2021
2. USDA ERS (Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture) (2023, November 30). Poultry and Eggs, Market Outlook, Available online: https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/poultry-eggs/market-outlook.
3. Hagelso, A.M. (1993). Animal Genetic Resources for Adaptation to More Extensive Production Systems, Commission of the European Communities.
4. Ethical considerations of gene editing and genetic selection;Rothschild;J. Gen. Fam. Med.,2020
5. Muir, W.M., Cheng, H.W., and Coney, C. (2014, January 23–27). New selection methods for layer performance and potential impacts on behavior and management. Proceedings of the XIVth European Poultry Conference, Stavanger, Norway.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献