Prevalence and Characterization of Salmonella during Pork Sausage Manufacturing
-
Published:2024-08-06
Issue:8
Volume:12
Page:1599
-
ISSN:2076-2607
-
Container-title:Microorganisms
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Microorganisms
Author:
Wottlin Lauren R.1ORCID, Harvey Roger B.1, Norman Keri N.2ORCID, Droleskey Robert E.1, Andrews Kathleen1, Jackson Steve J.3, Anderson Robin C.1ORCID, Poole Toni L.1
Affiliation:
1. Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX 77845, USA 2. Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, 3201 Russell Long Boulevard, College Station, TX 77843, USA 3. Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
Abstract
Pork carcasses and meat may harbor Salmonella and may contaminate other products during harvest and fabrication. Sources of contamination include manure on hides, environmental contamination, ingredients from external sources, and lymph nodes. Swine lymph nodes are often incorporated into ground meat, as their anatomical location makes removal labor prohibitive. A sausage processing plant in the midwestern United States was sampled monthly (except for December) from May 2021 to April 2022 to enumerate Salmonella and Enterobacteriaceae (EB) throughout the sausage manufacturing process to determine high-risk stages and efficiency of existing in-plant interventions. Salmonella serotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility were evaluated on a subset of isolates recovered at the end phases of sausage production. In each collection, samples were taken from the carcasses of eight sows through 11 stages of sausage manufacturing. A total of 830 samples were cultured. Thirty-four Salmonella were isolated from the final three production stages; of these, there were eleven serotypes. Three isolates displayed resistance to ampicillin, whereas the remainder of the isolates were pan-susceptible to the antimicrobials tested. Salmonella and EB were significantly reduced (p < 0.001) by acid washes at different stages of production, and the results point to the beneficial effects of interventions to lessen Salmonella concentrations in retail products.
Funder
United States Department of Agriculture
Reference31 articles.
1. Havelaar, A.H., Kirk, M.D., Torgerson, P.R., Gibb, H.J., Hald, T., Lake, R.J., Praet, N., Bellinger, D.C., de Silva, N.R., and Gargouri, N. (2015). World Health Organization Global Estimates and Regional Comparisons of the Burden of Foodborne Disease in 2010. PLoS Med., 12. 2. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States-major pathogens-Unspecified agents;Scallan;Emerg. Infect. Dis.,2011 3. (2024, June 26). (ERS), E.R.S.U.S.D.o.A. Total Cost of Foodborne Illness Estimates for 15 Leading Foodborne Pathogens, Available online: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/cost-estimates-of-foodborne-illnesses/. 4. Shahbandeh, M. (2024, June 13). Meat Consumption Worldwide 1990–2021, by Type. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/274522/global-per-capita-consumption-of-meat/. 5. National Pork Producers Council (2024, April 26). New Report Highlights U.S. Pork Industry Contributions to American Jobs and the Economy., Available online: https://nppc.org/press-releases/2021_economic_impact_report/.
|
|