Author:
Assa Hirbod,Pouralizadeh Mostafa,Badamchizadeh Abdolrahim
Abstract
While the main conceptual issue related to deposit insurances is the moral hazard risk, the main technical issue is inaccurate calibration of the implied volatility. This issue can raise the risk of generating an arbitrage. In this paper, first, we discuss that by imposing the no-moral-hazard risk, the removal of arbitrage is equivalent to removing the static arbitrage. Then, we propose a simple quadratic model to parameterize implied volatility and remove the static arbitrage. The process of removing the static risk is as follows: Using a machine learning approach with a regularized cost function, we update the parameters in such a way that butterfly arbitrage is ruled out and also implementing a calibration method, we make some conditions on the parameters of each time slice to rule out calendar spread arbitrage. Therefore, eliminating the effects of both butterfly and calendar spread arbitrage make the implied volatility surface free of static arbitrage.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference27 articles.
1. Modelling the Implied Volatility Surface, an Empirical Study for FTSE Options
www.theponytail.net/CCFEA
2. Risk management under a prudential policy
3. Designing sound deposit insurances
4. From SABR to Geodesics;Avellaneda,2005
5. Optimal Reinsurance Arrangements Under Tail Risk Measures
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献