Carbon Accounting in the Digital Industry: The Need to Move towards Decision Making in Uncertainty

Author:

Samuel Gabrielle1ORCID,Lucivero Federica2ORCID,Knowles Bran3ORCID,Wright Katherine3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King’s College London, Strand, London WC2B 4BG, UK

2. Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK

3. School of Computing and Communications, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4WA, UK

Abstract

In this paper, we present findings from a qualitative interview study, which highlights the difficulties and challenges with quantifying carbon emissions and discusses how to move productively through these challenges by drawing insights from studies of deep uncertainty. Our research study focuses on the digital sector and was governed by the following research question: how do practitioners researching, working, or immersed in the broad area of sustainable digitisation (researchers, industry, NGOs, and policy representatives) understand and engage with quantifying carbon? Our findings show how stakeholders struggled to measure carbon emissions across complex systems, the lack of standardisation to assist with this, and how these challenges led stakeholders to call for more data to address this uncertainty. We argue that these calls for more data obscure the fact that there will always be uncertainty, and that we must learn to govern from within it.

Funder

British Academy

UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Lancaster University as a contribution to the Data Science of the Natural Environment project

Wellcome Trust

King’s College London

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference56 articles.

1. Creating numbers: Carbon and capital investment;Vesty;Account. Audit. Account. J.,2015

2. Practicing, materialising and contesting environmental data;Gabrys;Big Data Soc.,2016

3. Carbon as a Metric of the Human;Whitington;PoLAR Political Leg. Anthropol. Rev.,2016

4. Virtual, visible, and actionable: Data assemblages and the sightlines of justice;Jasanoff;Big Data Soc.,2017

5. Peck, F.A. (2016). Carbon Chains: An Elemental Ethnography, University of California.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3