Post-Pandemic Maternity Care Planning for Vaccination: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Women, Partners, Health Care Professionals, and Policy Makers in the United Kingdom

Author:

Dasgupta Tisha1ORCID,Boulding Harriet2,Easter Abigail1,Sutedja Tania3,Khalil Asma45ORCID,Mistry Hiten D.1ORCID,Horgan Gillian1,Van Citters Aricca D.6ORCID,Nelson Eugene C.6,von Dadelszen Peter1ORCID,Duncan Emma L.7ORCID, ,Silverio Sergio A.18ORCID,Magee Laura A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Women & Children’s Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, UK

2. The Policy Institute, Faculty of Social Science & Public Policy, King’s College London, London WC2B 6LE, UK

3. The RESILIENT Study Patient & Public Involvement & Engagement Advisory Group, UK

4. Fetal Medicine Unit, St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK

5. Fetal Medicine Unit, Liverpool Women’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK

6. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03756, USA

7. Department of Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK

8. Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK

Abstract

Maternal vaccination during pregnancy, in general and against COVID-19 infection, offers protection to both mother and baby, but uptake remains suboptimal. This study aimed to explore the perceptions regarding COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, particularly for marginalised populations and those living with social or medical complexity. A total of 96 semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 40 women, 15 partners, 21 HCPs, and 20 policy makers, across all four nations of the United Kingdom (UK), discussing their lived experience of utilising, delivering, or developing policy for COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy during the pandemic. Three themes were derived: (1) historical and social context, (2) communication of information and guidance, and (3) appraisal and action. Together these captured the participants’ legacy of mistrust in drugs during pregnancy; prior positive experiences; concerns about missing information, conflicting information, or false information about COVID-19 vaccines; and confusing guidance for pregnant women. The final theme describes the participants’ behaviour and actions undertaken consequent to their experiences and the available information. The findings suggest efforts to improve COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy may be best focused on personalised communication of information. A trusting relationship and prior positive experiences with other vaccines, both in and outside of pregnancy, positively influenced perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Services & Delivery Research programme

National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration—South London [NIHR ARC-SL] Capacity Building Theme

Health Practices, Innovation & Implementation [HPII] Doctoral Fellowship

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference46 articles.

1. Vaccines in pregnancy: The dual benefit for pregnant women and infants;Marshall;Hum. Vaccin. Immunother.,2016

2. Laris-González, A., Bernal-Serrano, D., Jarde, A., and Kampmann, B. (2020). Safety of Administering Live Vaccines during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes. Vaccines, 8.

3. National Health Service (2023, October 05). Vaccinations in Pregnancy—NHS. Available online: https://www.nhs.uk/pregnancy/keeping-well/vaccinations/.

4. Maternal vaccines during the Covid-19 pandemic:A qualitative interview study with UK pregnant women;Anderson;Midwifery,2021

5. UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) (2024). Pertussis Vaccination Coverage for Pregnant Women in England, January to March and Annual Coverage 2021 to 2022, UK Health Security Agency.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3