Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis, Nutritional Ultrasound®, and Handgrip Strength as Innovative Methods for Monitoring Critical Anorexia Nervosa Physical Recovery: A Pilot Study
-
Published:2024-05-20
Issue:10
Volume:16
Page:1539
-
ISSN:2072-6643
-
Container-title:Nutrients
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nutrients
Author:
Romero-Márquez Jose M.12ORCID, Novo-Rodríguez María12, Novo-Rodríguez Cristina13, Siles-Guerrero Víctor1, Herrera-Montes Isabel1, Navarro-Pelayo Francisco Garzón4, López-de-la-Torre-Casares Martín13, Muñoz-Garach Araceli135
Affiliation:
1. Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, 18014 Granada, Spain 2. Foundation for Biosanitary Research of Eastern Andalusia—Alejandro Otero (FIBAO), 18012 Granada, Spain 3. Granada Biosanitary Research Institute (Ibs. Granada), 18014 Granada, Spain 4. Eating Disorders Hospital Unit, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, 18014 Granada, Spain 5. Network Biomedical Research Center Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CiberOBN), Carlos III Health Institute, 28029 Madrid, Spain
Abstract
Eating disorders (EDs) manifest as persistent disruptions in eating habits or related behaviors, significantly impacting physical health and psychosocial well-being. Nutritional assessment in ED patients is crucial for monitoring treatment efficacy. While dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) remains standard, interest in alternative methods such as bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) and Nutritional Ultrasound® (NU) has risen due to their affordability and portability. Additionally, hand dynamometry offers a user-friendly approach to assessing grip strength (HGS), indicative of nutritional status. A prospective study was carried out to evaluate the utility of BIVA, NU®, and HGS in 43 female AN patients. Measurements were taken at baseline and hospital discharge. A total of 41 patients completed the study. After the intervention, numerous BIVA-related parameters such as fat (3.5 ± 2 kg vs. 5.3 ± 2.7 kg, p < 0.001) and free fat mass (33.9 ± 3.8 kg vs. 37.5 ± 4.1 kg, p < 0.001) were partially restored. Similarly, Nutritional Ultrasound® showed promising results in assessing body composition changes such as total abdominal fat tissue (0.5 ± 0.3 cm vs. 0.9 ± 0.3 cm, p < 0.05). In the same way, rectus femoris cross-sectional area values correlated with clinical outcomes such as free fat mass (0.883, p < 0.05) and appendicular muscle mass (0.965, p < 0.001). HGS reached the normality percentile after the intervention (21.6 ± 9.1 kg vs. 25.9 ± 12.3 kg, p < 0.05), demonstrating a significant association between grip strength and body composition parameters such as free fat mass (0.658, p < 0.001) and appendicular muscle mass (0.482, p < 0.001). Incorporating BIVA-, NU®-, and HGS-enhanced nutritional assessment into the treatment of AN patients offers cost-effective, portable, and non-invasive alternatives to DEXA. These techniques offer valuable insights into changes in body composition and nutritional status, which, in turn, facilitate treatment monitoring and contribute to improved patient outcomes.
Reference47 articles.
1. Monteleone, A.M., Pellegrino, F., Croatto, G., Carfagno, M., Hilbert, A., Treasure, J., Wade, T., Bulik, C., Zipfel, S., and Hay, P. (2022). Treatment of Eating Disorders: A Systematic Meta-Review of Meta-Analyses and Network Meta-Analyses. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 142. 2. Body Composition and Nutritional Status Changes in Adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa;An. Pediatría (Engl. Ed.),2023 3. Prevalence of Disordered Eating and Its Associated Factors From a Socioecological Approach Among a Sample of Spanish Adolescents: The EHDLA Study;Mesas;Int. J. Public Health,2023 4. Recovery From Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa at 22-Year Follow-Up;Eddy;J. Clin. Psychiatry,2017 5. An Overview of Conceptualizations of Eating Disorder Recovery, Recent Findings, and Future Directions;Hunt;Curr. Psychiatry Rep.,2018
|
|