Does Changing a Scale’s Context Impact Its Psychometric Properties? A Comparison Using the PERMA-Profiler and the Workplace PERMA-Profiler

Author:

Rice Sean P. M.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University—Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA

2. Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA

Abstract

The present study evaluated the empirical distinction between the PERMA-Profiler and the Workplace PERMA-Profiler, which measure flourishing using the same items with different contexts (i.e., general vs. workplace orientations). Both scales were administered online via MTurk (N = 601), and single-group measurement and structural invariances were assessed. Partial metric and scalar invariances were supported, indicating that the PERMA constructs were measured equivalently across scales (except for the relationships factor). Structural properties (covariances, means) were not invariant, indicating distinct utility for each scale in their respective contexts. The results suggest that simple adaptations to items to change their context, but not content, may retain the original scale’s psychometric properties and function with discrimination.

Funder

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Washington State University and the Total Worker Health

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference33 articles.

1. The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing;Butler;Int. J. Wellbeing,2016

2. Kern, M.L. (2024, March 03). The Workplace PERMA Profiler. Available online: https://www.peggykern.org/uploads/5/6/6/7/56678211/workplace_perma_profiler_102014.pdf.

3. Seligman, M.E.P. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-Being, Simon & Schuster.

4. What is psychological well-being, really? A grassroots approach from the organizational sciences;Savoie;J. Happiness Stud.,2012

5. Luthans, F.L., Avolio, B.J., and Avey, J.A. (2024, March 03). Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PsyCap); [Database Record]; APA PsycTests: 2007. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1037/t06483-000.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3