Affiliation:
1. Department of Animal Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
2. Department of Crop, Soil & Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
3. Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Clemson University, Blackville, SC 29817, USA
Abstract
Soybean (Glycine max L.) is a high value crop that has been used as a forage since the early 1900s in the southern U.S. (e.g., Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida). Renewed interest has increased the use of soybean as a viable and economical high protein alternative to forage growers in the southern region. The objective of this study was to determine herbage mass (HM) and nutritive value of forage soybean managed under two row spacing (36 and 72 cm) and three stubble heights (10, 15, and 20 cm). Five cultivars were used ‘Stonewall’, ‘Laredo’, ‘Tower of Leaves’, Asgrow® ‘AG64X8’, and Asgrow® ‘AG79X9’ and sown at two locations (Shorter and Headland, AL). Forage was harvested in July and August during both years and HM was determined. Crude protein (CP) and fiber fractions were determined using near-infrared spectroscopy. Years and location did vary, but overall, Stonewall had the greatest (p < 0.026) HM (1706 kg DM ha−1) with a high nutritive value (124 g CP kg−1, 449 g NDF kg−1, and 372 g ADF kg−1). Laredo had the lowest HM (1169 kg DM ha−1; p < 0.025). The 10 cm stubble height resulted in increased HM (1898 kg DM ha−1; p < 0.0001) but decreased nutritive value (149 g CP kg−1; 331 g ADF kg−1; 413 g NDF kg−1; p = 0.001) compared to 20 cm (179, 282, and 375 g kg−1 for CP, ADF, and NDF, respectively). Row spacing did not consistently influence either HM or nutritive values. Due to its relatively good nutritive value and HM, forage soybean should be considered as a monoculture or in a mixed sward with other warm-season annual forages for inclusion in forage-based livestock diets.
Funder
USDA-NIRA Hatch Project ALA
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference31 articles.
1. Perennial Peanut for Quality Pasture and Hay;Flores;Agri. Res.,2008
2. Forage yield trend of alfalfa cultivars in the Canadian prairies and its relation to environmental factos and harvest management;Ren;Grass Forage Sci.,2021
3. Bhattarai, S., Biswas, D., Fu, Y.-B., and Biligetu, B. (2020). Morphological, Physiological, and Genetic Responses to Salt Stress in Alfalfa: A Review. Agronomy, 10.
4. Planting date and preplant tillage effects on emergence and survival of rhizoma perennial peanut;Williams;Crop. Sci.,1993
5. Forage soybean yield and quality responses to plant density and row distance;Seiter;Agron. J.,2004
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献