Israeli and Palestinian Settler Colonialism in New Media: The Case of Roots

Author:

Pycińska Magdalena1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of International and Political Studies Academic, Institute of the Middle and Far East, Jagiellonian University, Oleandry 2a, 30-063 Krakow, Poland

Abstract

Israeli settler colonialism, in time, became highly linked to the idea of a state, culminating in an institution that defends the past, present, and future practises maintaining the relations between the “native” and “settlers”. Settler colonial ideas and practises sustaining binary opposition between the “native” and the “settler” are reproduced not only by Israeli state broadcasters, but also by settler colonial social media. This article proposes media analysis that goes beyond the usual national and conflict narrative and links “settler colonial common sense” with social media impacts and state ideas/sovereign ideas of property that strive to eliminate native people or transfer them outside Israel’s perceived land ownership and sovereignty. This article also shows how Israeli settler colonial politics and narratives are supported by other settler colonial states (especially the United States). New media and settler common sense cannot be disassociated from the Israeli state and global politics, even though some settlers may have their own strategies regarding the relations with native Palestinians. The State of Israel, through massive surveillance technologies and support from other states that view militarisation and population management as crucial to maintaining its power, holds a great deal of influence over how it frames the “conflict” with Palestinians. We witness how both state violence and institutionalised Jewish privilege are recreated on the ground and globally through the new media. This issue is analysed through the “Roots” (a grassroots movement for understanding among Israelis and Palestinians) case study.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference97 articles.

1. 7amleh (2023, May 19). The Attacks on Palestinian Digital Rights Progress Report. Available online: https://7amleh.org/storage/The%20Attacks%20on%20Palestinian%20Digital%20Rights.pdf.

2. Abu-Lughod, Ibrahim, and Abu-Laban, Baha (1974). Settler Regimes in Africa and the Arab World: The Illusion of Endurance, Medina University Press International.

3. Al-Haq (2022, July 10). The Surveillance Industry and Human Rights: Israel’s Marketing of the Occupation of Palestine. Available online: https://www.alhaq.org/cached_uploads/download/alhaq_files/images/stories/PDF/Submission_to_the_UN_Special_Rapporteur_on_the_Promotion_and_Protection_of_the_Right_to_Freedom_of_Opinion_and_Expression.pdf.

4. Amer, Sahar (2022, July 20). Available online: https://english.alaraby.co.uk/analysis/how-israel-automating-occupation-palestine.

5. Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy;Appadurai;Theory, Culture & Society,1990

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3