A Hybrid MCDM Approach Based on Fuzzy MEREC-G and Fuzzy RATMI

Author:

Makki Anas A.1ORCID,Abdulaal Reda M. S.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering—Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

2. Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Applied Sciences, AlMaarefa University, Ad Diriyah 13713, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) assists in making judgments on complex problems by evaluating several alternatives based on conflicting criteria. Several MCDM methods have been introduced. However, real-world problems often involve uncertain and ambiguous decision-maker inputs. Therefore, fuzzy MCDM methods have emerged to handle this problem using fuzzy logic. Most recently, the method based on the removal effects of criteria using the geometric mean (MEREC-G) and ranking the alternatives based on the trace to median index (RATMI) were introduced. However, to date, there is no fuzzy extension of the two novel methods. This study introduces a new hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach combining fuzzy MEREC-G and fuzzy RATMI. The fuzzy MEREC-G can accept linguistic input terms from multiple decision-makers and generates consistent fuzzy weights. The fuzzy RATMI can rank alternatives according to their fuzzy performance scores on each criterion. The study provides the algorithms of both fuzzy MEREC-G and fuzzy RATMI and demonstrates their application in adopted real-world problems. Correlation and scenario analyses were performed to check the new approach’s validity and sensitivity. The new approach demonstrates high accuracy and consistency and is sufficiently sensitive to changes in the criteria weights, yet not too sensitive to produce inconsistent rankings.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Reference73 articles.

1. Multi-criteria decision making: A systematic review;Azhar;Recent Adv. Electr. Electron. Eng. Former. Recent Pat. Electr. Electron. Eng.,2021

2. Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts;Taherdoost;Encyclopedia,2023

3. Which objective weight method is better: PCA or entropy?;Robert;Sci. J. Res. Rev.,2022

4. A review of selected weighing methods in MCDM with a case study;Singh;Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag.,2021

5. Weighting methods for multi-criteria decision-making technique;Odu;J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag.,2019

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3