Running-Related Overuse Injuries and Their Relationship with Run and Resistance Training Characteristics in Adult Recreational Runners: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author:

Stenerson Lea R.12ORCID,Melton Bridget F.13ORCID,Bland Helen W.4ORCID,Ryan Greg A.5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health and Human Performance, Concordia University of Chicago, River Forest, IL 60305, USA

2. Department of Biology, Regis University, Denver, CO 80221, USA

3. Department of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30458, USA

4. Department of Health Policy and Community Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30458, USA

5. Department of Health Sciences, Piedmont University, Demorest, GA 30535, USA

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize running-related injuries (RRIs), explore their relationship with run and resistance training (RT) parameters, and identify perceived prevention measures among adult recreational runners. An anonymous online survey was designed and distributed via social media and email. Data were analyzed with chi-square, t-test, or analysis of variance (ANOVA), with significance accepted at p ≤ 0.05. Data from 616 participants (76.8% female, age: 42.3 ± 10.5 y) were analyzed. Most runners (84.4%) had an injury history, with 44.6% experiencing one in the past year. The most common RRI sites included the foot/ankle (30.9%) and knee (22.2%). RRI prevalence was higher in those running >19 miles weekly (48.4%, p = 0.05), but there were no differences based on RT participation status. Among those using RT, relatively more RRIs were observed in runners who trained the hip musculature (50.3%, p = 0.005) and did not include the upper body (61.6%, p < 0.001). A disproportionately high RRI prevalence was found for several of the other risk-reduction strategies. RRIs remain a substantial problem, particularly around the ankle/foot and knee. Higher run volume and performance motives were positively associated with RRIs. Most runners incorporated RRI risk-reduction techniques, with over half using RT. The current study did not determine whether preventative strategies were implemented before or after injury; therefore, prospective studies controlling for previous injuries are required to evaluate the effectiveness of RT in preventing future RRIs.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Histology,Rheumatology,Anatomy

Reference48 articles.

1. Andersen, J., and RunRepeat (2022, July 08). The State of Running 2019. Available online: https://runrepeat.com/state-of-running.

2. Lange, D., and Statistica (2022, July 08). Running & Jogging—Statistics & Facts. Available online: https://www.statista.com/topics/1743/running-and-jogging/.

3. Age-related motives in mass running events participation;Malchrowicz;Olimp. J. Olymp. Stud.,2018

4. Janssen, M., Walravens, R., Thibaut, E., Scheerder, J., Brombacher, A., and Vos, S. (2020). Understanding different types of recreational runners and how they use running-related technology. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.

5. Meta-analyses of the effects of habitual running on indices of health in physically inactive adults;Hespanhol;Sports Med.,2015

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3