Content-Focused Formative Feedback Combining Achievement, Qualitative and Learning Analytics Data

Author:

Martinez Cecilia1ORCID,Serra Ramiro2ORCID,Sundaramoorthy Prem2ORCID,Booij Thomas2ORCID,Vertegaal Cornelis2ORCID,Bounik Zahra2,van Hastenberg Kevin2ORCID,Bentum Mark2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Instituto de Humanidades, CONICET, National University of Cordoba, Av. Haya de la Torre, Córdoba 5000, Argentina

2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, 5612 AP Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Abstract

Research that integrates Learning Analytics (LA) with formative feedback has been shown to enhance student individual learning processes and performance. Debates on LA-based feedback highlight the need to further understand what data sources are appropriate for LA, how soon the feedback should be sent to students and how different types of feedback promote learning. This study describes an empirical case of LA-based feedback in higher education and analyzes how content-focused feedback promotes student achievement. The model combines quantitative achievement indicators with qualitative data about student learning challenges to develop feedback. Data sources include student pretest results, participation in practice exercises as well as midterm and final exam grades. In addition, in-depth interviews with high-, medium- and low-performing students are conducted to understand learning challenges. Based on their performance, students receive content-focused feedback every two weeks. The results show statistically significant improvements in final grades, in addition to a higher rate of problem-solving participation among students who receive feedback compared to their peers who opt out of the study. The contributions to the area of LA-based formative feedback are the following: (a) a model that combines quantitative with qualitative data sources to predict and understand student achievement challenges, (b) templates to design pedagogical and research-based formative feedback, (c) quantitative and qualitative positive results of the experience, (d) a documented case describing the practical implementation process.

Funder

The Netherlands Initiative for Education Research

Eindhoven University of Technology

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3