One Font Doesn’t Fit All: The Influence of Digital Text Personalization on Comprehension in Child and Adolescent Readers-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

One Font Doesn’t Fit All: The Influence of Digital Text Personalization on Comprehension in Child and Adolescent Readers

Published:2023-08-24 Issue:9 Volume:13 Page:864
ISSN:2227-7102
Container-title:Education Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:Education Sciences

Author:

Sheppard Shannon M.¹^ORCID,Nobles Susanne L.²^ORCID,Palma Anton³^ORCID,Kajfez Sophie¹,Jordan Marjorie⁴,Crowley Kathy⁴^ORCID,Beier Sofie⁵^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA

2. ReadWorks, Brooklyn, NY 11202, USA

3. Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92617, USA

4. Readability Matters, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA

5. School of Design, Royal Danish Academy, 1435 Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

Reading comprehension is an essential skill. It is unclear whether and to what degree typography and font personalization may impact reading comprehension in younger readers. With advancements in technology, it is now feasible to personalize digital reading formats in general technology tools, but this feature is not yet available for many educational tools. The current study aimed to investigate the effect of character width and inter-letter spacing on reading speed and comprehension. We enrolled 94 children (kindergarten–8th grade) and compared performance with six font variations on a word-level semantic decision task (Experiment 1) and a passage-level comprehension task (Experiment 2). Reading speed and comprehension were analyzed using generalized linear mixed-effects regression models. Independent samples t-tests compared speed and comprehension accuracy on personal best vs. worst font variation. A stability analysis was conducted to determine if participants had a stable personal best font variation within Experiment 1. The Experiment 1 stability analysis was statistically significant, and 58% of participants had a stable personal best font variation. Personal best font variations yielded significantly higher comprehension accuracy in both Experiments 1 and 2 and faster reading in Experiment 2. Using digital technology to personalize font may have important implications for school-aged readers.

Funder

Readability Matters

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Link

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/9/864/pdf

Reference72 articles.

1. Gaab, N. (2019). How Can We Ensure That Every Child Will Learn to Read? The Need for a Global, Neurodevelopmental Perspective, International Dyslexia Association. Available online: https://dyslexiaida.org/how-can-we-ensure-that-every-child-will-learn-to-read-the-need-for-a-global-neurodevelopmental-perspective/.

2. Bandeira de Mello, V., Rahman, T., Fox, M.A., and Ji, C.S. (2019). Mapping State Proficiency Standards Onto the NAEP Scales: Results From the 2017 NAEP Reading and Mathematics Assessments (NCES 2019-040).

3. ‘I’Babies: Infants’ and Toddlers’ Emergent Language and Literacy in a Digital Culture of IDevices;Harrison;J. Early Child. Lit.,2018

4. E-textbooks: A Personalized Learning Experience or a Digital Distraction?;Dobler;J. Adolesc. Adult Lit.,2015

5. The International Children’s Digital Library: Viewing Digital Books Online;Hourcade;Interact. Comput.,2003