Automated Interlaboratory Comparison of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Data and Its Use for Evaluation of Published Therapeutic Reference Ranges

Author:

Larsen Jens Borggaard1,Hoffmann-Lücke Elke23ORCID,Aaslo Per Hersom4,Jørgensen Niklas Rye56,Greibe Eva23

Affiliation:

1. The Datasupport Centre for Personalised Medicine, Region South, DK 5000 Odense, Denmark

2. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, DK 8200 Aarhus, Denmark

3. Institute for Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, DK 8000 Aarhus, Denmark

4. The Laboratory of the Danish Epilepsy Centre–Filadelfia, DK 4293 Dianalund, Denmark

5. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Rigshospitalet, DK 2600 Glostrup, Denmark

6. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK 1165 Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring is a tool for optimising the pharmacological treatment of diseases where the therapeutic effect is difficult to measure or monitor. Therapeutic reference ranges and dose-effect relation are the main requirements for this drug titration tool. Defining and updating therapeutic reference ranges are difficult, and there is no standardised method for the calculation and clinical qualification of these. The study presents a basic model for validating and selecting routine laboratory data. The programmed algorithm was applied on data sets of antidepressants and antipsychotics from three public hospitals in Denmark. Therapeutic analytical ranges were compared with the published therapeutic reference ranges by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP) and in additional literature. For most of the drugs, the calculated therapeutic analytical ranges showed good concordance between the laboratories and to published therapeutic reference ranges. The exceptions were flupentixol, haloperidol, paroxetine, perphenazine, and venlafaxine + o-desmethyl-venlafaxine (total plasma concentration), where the range was considerably higher for the laboratory data, while the calculated range of desipramine, sertraline, ziprasidone, and zuclopenthixol was considerably lower. In most cases, we identified additional literature supporting our data, highlighting the need of a critical re-examination of current therapeutic reference ranges in Denmark. An automated approach can aid in the evaluation of current and future therapeutic reference ranges by providing additional information based on big data from multiple laboratories.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pharmaceutical Science

Reference64 articles.

1. Clinical relevance of TDM of SSRIs;Schwarz;Ther. Drug Monit.,2006

2. Therapeutic drug monitoring of atypical antipsychotics;Urban;Psychiatr. Pol.,2017

3. Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neuropsychopharmacology: Update 2017;Hiemke;Pharmacopsychiatry,2018

4. Therapeutic drug monitoring of antibiotics;Bertino;Lancet Infect. Dis.,2014

5. A review on therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs;Mohammadpour;Iran J. Basic Med. Sci.,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3