Modulus of Elasticity in Plywood Boards: Comparison between a Destructive and a Nondestructive Method

Author:

de la Cruz-Carrera Ricardo1,Carrillo-Parra Artemio2ORCID,Prieto-Ruíz José Ángel3ORCID,Fuentes-Talavera Francisco Javier4ORCID,Ruiz-Aquino Faustino5ORCID,Goche-Télles José Rodolfo3

Affiliation:

1. Programa Institucional de Doctorado en Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango (UJED), Durango 34113, Durango, Mexico

2. Instituto de Silvicultura e Industria de la Madera, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango (UJED), Durango 34113, Durango, Mexico

3. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Ambientales, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango (UJED), Durango 34113, Durango, Mexico

4. Departamento de Madera Celulosa y Papel, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara (UdG), Guadalajara 44100, Jalisco, Mexico

5. Instituto de Estudios Ambientales, Universidad de la Sierra Juárez (UNSIJ), Ixtlán de Juárez 68725, Oaxaca, Mexico

Abstract

Nondestructive methods are a fast and accurate way to obtain information about the mechanical properties of plywood panels. The objective was to determine the modulus of rupture and compare the modulus of elasticity (MOE) in plywood boards made with Pinus spp. and Eucalyptus urograndis using the destructive method of three-point static bending and the nondestructive method of ultrasound in parallel and perpendicular directions, as well as in complete board and test specimens, both with the ultrasound method and the correlation between the variables studied. The plywood boards evaluated were 18, 25 and 30 mm nominal thickness. Five structures were evaluated using pine and pine–eucalyptus veneers. Three boards were collected per structure, and 28 specimens were made from each board (14 in a parallel direction and 14 in a perpendicular direction). The elastic modulus was determined by the ultrasound method in complete plywood boards and in specimens obtained from them using the IML Micro Hammer® equipment and through the conventional bending test, carried out in an Instron® universal mechanical testing machine. The Tukey test of means (p < 0.05) shows that in the nominal thickness of 18 mm, the modulus of elasticity by ultrasound was lower compared to the result obtained by static bending in four of the five structures in the perpendicular direction and lower in all the structures evaluated in the parallel direction; while in the nominal thickness of 25 and 30 mm, it was greater in all structures and in both directions. The results of static bending by ultrasound, in complete boards and specimens, show that the only significant difference (p < 0.05) occurs in the nominal thickness of 30 mm in the treatment made with pine–eucalyptus with urea formaldehyde resin being lower in the parallel direction and in complete boards The correlation between the modulus of elasticity determined on specimens using the nondestructive method and the destructive method was r = 0.75 and Pr < 0.05; while comparing the nondestructive method on test specimens and complete plywood panels, r = 0.73 and Pr < 0.05 were obtained. It is concluded that the mechanical bending property of plywood boards can be characterized by the ultrasound method.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference47 articles.

1. Understanding the interaction between bonding strength and strain distribution of plywood;Li;Int. J. Adhes. Adhes.,2020

2. Fabrication and characterization of HDPE resins as adhesives in plywood;Chang;Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod.,2018

3. Kinetic and mechanism of the thermal degradation of a plywood by using thermogravimetry and Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy analysis in nitrogen and air atmosphere;Fateh;Fire Saf. J.,2013

4. Dynamic mechanical characteristics of poplar veneers painted with damping coatings;Xu;J. Nanjing For. Univ.,2016

5. Análisis de la estructura físico-mecánica de muebles a base de tablero de fibras de densidad media y madera contrachapada;Camero;Cienc. For. Y Ambient.,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3