Abstract
Objective: This single-blind randomized controlled crossover pilot trial investigated whether hard or soft knee orthotics affect the back in action (BIA) test battery performance. Methods: Twenty-four healthy participants (13 males, 11 females) were randomly assigned into three equal groups differentiated through the order of device use. The data were collected in a laboratory setting. BIA test battery (balance tests, vertical jumps, and parkour hop tests) was run with a rigid orthotic device, a soft brace, or no aid in a crossover order. Analysis of Variance repeated measures and Friedman Test were used to calculate depended-group differences. Results: No significant or clinically relevant effect or differences was observed between running the BIA with a soft brace, rigid orthosis, or no aid (p = 0.53–0.97) for all included tests. No adverse events have been observed. Conclusion: Soft and rigid knee braces do not affect performance in healthy participants. Missing experience with the devices might explain a few influences on feedback mechanisms. There is no disadvantage to be expected regarding healthy participants running back to sports.
Reference36 articles.
1. Prosthetics and Orthotics—Vocabulary—Part 1: General Terms for External Limb Prostheses and External Orthoses (Standard No. ISO 8549-1:2020). Available online: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:8549:-3:ed-2:v1:en.
2. Knee braces: Current evidence and clinical recommendations for their use;Am. Fam. Phys.,2000
3. The Effectiveness of a Functional Knee Brace on Joint-Position Sense in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Individuals;J. Sport Rehabil.,2016
4. The effectiveness of prophylactic knee bracing in american football: A systematic review;Sports Health,2010
5. Effects of knee orthoses on kinesthetic awareness and balance in healthy individuals;J. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. Eng.,2019
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献