Abstract
A lack of water quality information for many water bodies around the world makes it difficult to identify global change and discover early signs of myriad threats to freshwater resources. This problem is widely seen in Ethiopia due to absence of regular monitoring. Citizen science has a great potential to fill these gaps in water quality data, but there is concern about the accuracy of data collected by citizen scientists. Moreover, there is a gap to engage citizen scientists in water quality monitoring, and there is still insufficient awareness of how citizen scientists can become part of a collaborative scheme. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of water quality collected by citizen scientists and characterize the water quality of the Meki River with the involvement of citizen scientists. The suitability of the river water for irrigation was evaluated using a combination of citizen science and conventional water quality data collection methods. Water temperature, turbidity, ammonia, phosphate, nitrate, nitrite, total alkalinity, total hardness, and pH were analyzed by both citizen scientists and in a conventional laboratory. The citizen scientists’ data, expressed as percent of synthetic standard solution concentrations, indicated good agreement for selected water quality parameters: 123.8 ± 24.7% for PO43−, 115.6 ± 6.3% for NO3−, 105.8 ± 7.4% for pH, and 133.3 ± 23.6% for NH4+. Thus, citizen scientists can monitor and collect water quality data accurately. From the results, the Meki River water can be used for irrigation, but pollution sources should be controlled to reduce further quality deterioration as the population increases.
Funder
Water Security and Sustainable Development Hub fund, by the UK Research and Innovation’s Global Challenges Research Fund
Royal Society
school of graduate studies, Arba Minch University
Subject
Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry
Reference31 articles.
1. FAO (2017). A Report Produced for the G20 Presidency of Germany, FAO.
2. Success factors for citizen science projects in water quality monitoring;Kokimova;Sci. Total Environ.,2020
3. Pocock MJ, O., Chapman, D.S., Sheppard, L.J., and Roy, H.E. (2014). Choosing and Using Citizen Science: A Guide to When and How to Use Citizen Science to Monitor Biodiversity and the Environment, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. Available online: https://www.ceh.ac.uk/sites/default/files/sepa_choosingandusingcitizenscience_interactive_4web_final_amended-blue1.pdf.
4. The benefits and negative impacts of citizen science applications to water as experienced by participants and communities;Walker;WIREs Water,2021
5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Advisory Council for Environmental Polocy and Technology (2022, November 08). Environmental Protection Belongs to the Public, A Vision for Citizen Science at EPA, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/faca/nacept-2016-report-environmental-protection-belongs-public-vision-citizen-science-epa%0Ahttp://files/2098/nacept-2016-report-environmental-protection-belongs-public-vision-citizen-science-epa.html.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献